Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25691240›Full record

SynthesisJournal of general internal medicine2015

The effect of charge display on cost of care and physician practice behaviors: a systematic review.

Celine Goetz, Stephen R Rotman, George Hartoularos, Tara F Bishop

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Journal of general internal medicine, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. The effect of displaying laboratory test prices on physicians' ordering behaviour: a systematic review of European studies.The European journal of health economics : HEPAC : health economics in prevention and care · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Huisarts en wetenschap · 2022
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Canadian family physician Medecin de famille canadien · 2020
    Article
  15. Engaging physicians to prescribe more cost-effectively: Blueprint for change.Canadian family physician Medecin de famille canadien · 2020
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Celine GoetzDivision of Hospital Medicine, Department of Medicine, Mount Sinai Hospital, 1 Gustave Levy Place, Box 1087, New York, NY, 10029, USA, celine.goetz@mountsinai.org.
Stephen R Rotman
George Hartoularos
Tara F Bishop

Funding

Hospital employment of physicians and the quality of care for older adultsK23AG043499 · NIA · WEILL MEDICAL COLL OF CORNELL UNIV · PI BISHOP, TARA F · 2012 to 2015
$523k
NIA NIH HHS K23 AG043499NIA NIH HHS K23AG043499
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWhile studies have been published in the last 30 years that examine the effect of charge display during physician decision-making, no analysis or synthesis of these studies has been conducted.

objectiveWe aimed to determine the type and quality of charge display studies that have been published; to synthesize this information in the form of a literature review.

methodsEnglish-language articles published between 1982 and 2013 were identified using MEDLINE, Web of Knowledge, ABI-Inform, and Academic Search Premier. Article titles, abstracts, and text were reviewed for relevancy by two authors. Data were then extracted and subsequently synthesized and analyzed.

resultsSeventeen articles were identified that fell into two topic categories: the effect of charge display on radiology and laboratory test ordering versus on medication choice. Seven articles were randomized controlled trials, eight were pre-intervention vs. post-intervention studies, and two interventions had a concurrent control and intervention groups, but were not randomized. Twelve studies were conducted in a clinical environment, whereas five were survey studies. Of the nine clinically based interventions that examined test ordering, seven had statistically significant reductions in cost and/or the number of tests ordered. Two of the three clinical studies looking at medication expenditures found significant reductions in cost. In the survey studies, physicians consistently chose fewer tests or lower cost options in the theoretical scenarios presented.

conclusionsIn the majority of studies, charge information changed ordering and prescribing behavior.

Indexed as

Fees and ChargesHealth Care CostsPractice Patterns, Physicians'Cost SavingsDiagnostic Tests, RoutineHealth PersonnelHumansPrescription Fees

Identifiers

PMID25691240
PMCPMC4441675

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.