Trial reportJournal of general internal medicine2015
A Randomized Controlled Trial of a CPR and Intubation Video Decision Support Tool for Hospitalized Patients.
Trial report in Journal of general internal medicine, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01325519 (A Prospective Randomized Trial Using Video Images in Advance Care Planning in Seriously Ill Hospitalized Patients), which is not on this map. Cited by 43 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Prospective Randomized Trial Using Video Images in Advance Care Planning in Seriously Ill Hospitalized Patients
Who cites it
43 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 89 citations in OpenAlex.
- Goals of care discussions in hospitalised patients: systematic review of randomised trials.BMJ supportive & palliative care · 2026Pooled it
- Decision coaching for people making healthcare decisions.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2021Pooled it
- Association of Communication Interventions to Discuss Code Status With Patient Decisions for Do-Not-Resuscitate Orders: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.JAMA network open · 2019Pooled it
- Improving hospital-based end of life care processes and outcomes: a systematic review of research output, quality and effectiveness.BMC palliative care · 2017Pooled it
- An Intervention to Increase Advance Care Planning Among Older Adults With Advanced Cancer: A Randomized Clinical Trial.JAMA network open · 2025Trial
- Video Intervention and Goals-of-Care Documentation in Hospitalized Older Adults: The VIDEO-PCE Randomized Clinical Trial.JAMA network open · 2023Trial
- A Pilot Randomized Trial of an Advance Care Planning Video Decision Support Tool for Adolescents and Young Adults With Advanced Cancer.Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network : JNCCN · 2023Trial
- Randomized Controlled Trial of a Decision Support Intervention About Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation for Hospitalized Patients Who Have a High Risk of Death.Journal of general internal medicine · 2021Trial
- Use of a Supportive Kidney Care Video Decision Aid in Older Patients: A Randomized Controlled Trial.American journal of nephrology · 2020Trial
- Usability of PCforMe in Patients With Advanced Cancer Referred to Outpatient Palliative Care: Results of a Randomized, Active-Controlled Pilot Trial.Journal of pain and symptom management · 2019Trial
- Trial
- An Advance Care Planning Video Decision Support Tool for Nursing Home Residents With Advanced Dementia: A Cluster Randomized Clinical Trial.JAMA internal medicine · 2018Trial
- Trial
- Randomized, Controlled Trial of an Advance Care Planning Video Decision Support Tool for Patients With Advanced Heart Failure.Circulation · 2016Trial
- Advancing Discussions Using a Video-Based Support Tool About End-of-Life Care (ADVISE): Protocol for a Single-Center Randomized Controlled Trial.JMIR research protocols · 2026Article
- Effect of Emergency Department-Initiated Video-Enhanced Advance Care Planning on Documentation and Goal-Concordant Care: A Randomized Clinical Trial.Journal of general internal medicine · 2026Article
- Does Checklist-Guided Shared Decision Making Have a Sustained Effect on Code Status Decisions Among Medical Inpatients? Long-Term Follow Up of the Randomized CLEAR Checklist Trial.Journal of general internal medicine · 2026Article
- Do not attempt cardiopulmonary resuscitation decision-making process: scoping review.BMJ supportive & palliative care · 2025Article
- Measuring decision aid effectiveness for end-of-life care: A systematic review.PEC innovation · 2024Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
16 authors at 7 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundDecisions about cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) and intubation are a core part of advance care planning, particularly for seriously ill hospitalized patients. However, these discussions are often avoided.
objectivesWe aimed to examine the impact of a video decision tool for CPR and intubation on patients' choices, knowledge, medical orders, and discussions with providers.
designThis was a prospective randomized trial conducted between 9 March 2011 and 1 June 2013 on the internal medicine services at two hospitals in Boston.
participantsOne hundred and fifty seriously ill hospitalized patients over the age of 60 with an advanced illness and a prognosis of 1 year or less were included. Mean age was 76 and 51% were women.
interventionThree-minute video describing CPR and intubation plus verbal communication of participants' preferences to their physicians (intervention) (N = 75) or control arm (usual care) (N = 75). MAIN MEASURES: The primary outcome was participants' preferences for CPR and intubation (immediately after viewing the video in the intervention arm). Secondary outcomes included: orders to withhold CPR/intubation, documented discussions with providers during hospitalization, and participants' knowledge of CPR/ intubation (five-item test, range 0-5, higher scores indicate greater knowledge).
resultsIntervention participants (vs. controls) were more likely not to want CPR (64% vs. 32%, p <0.0001) and intubation (72% vs. 43%, p < 0.0001). Intervention participants (vs. controls) were also more likely to have orders to withhold CPR (57% vs. 19%, p < 0.0001) and intubation (64% vs.19%, p < 0.0001) by hospital discharge, documented discussions about their preferences (81% vs. 43%, p < 0.0001), and higher mean knowledge scores (4.11 vs. 2.45; p < 0.0001).
conclusionsSeriously ill patients who viewed a video about CPR and intubation were more likely not to want these treatments, be better informed about their options, have orders to forgo CPR/ intubation, and discuss preferences with providers.
trial registrationClinicaltrials.gov NCT01325519 Registry Name: A prospective randomized trial using video images in advance care planning in seriously ill hospitalized patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.