Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25691129›Full record

SynthesisThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2015

Videolaryngoscopy versus direct laryngoscopy for tracheal intubation in neonates.

Krithika Lingappan, Jennifer L Arnold, Thomas L Shaw, Caraciolo J Fernandes, Mohan Pammi

4 registry-linked trialsAbstract readSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 4 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.5field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03089528 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2017, after this paper: background citation

Videolaryngoscopy Versus Direct Laryngoscopy for Tracheal Intubation in Patients With Diabetes Mellitus

TypeinterventionalSponsorDiskapi Teaching and Research HospitalRan2017 to 2018Enrolled85ConditionsAnesthesia, Diabetes Mellitus, Intubation, DifficultArmsVideolaryngoscopy, laringoscope
NCT03112798 unknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2017, after this paper: background citation

Miller vs Macintosh Size 0 Blades for Tracheal Intubation of Infants Under 1 Month: a Randomized Comparative Study

Typeobservational_patient_registrySponsorIstanbul Science UniversityRan2017 to 2017Enrolled25ConditionsNewborn
NCT03336476 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2018, after this paper: background citation

Can Videolaryngoscopy be the First Choice for Tracheal Intubation in Patients With Diabetes

TypeinterventionalSponsorDiskapi Teaching and Research HospitalRan2018 to 2019Enrolled110ConditionsDiabetes MellitusArmsVideolaryngoscopy, Direct laryngoscopy
NCT03396432 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2018, after this paper: background citation

The Videolaryngoscopy in Small Infants (VISI) Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorChildren's Hospital of PhiladelphiaRan2018 to 2020Enrolled566ConditionsSurgery, Anesthesia, EndotrachealArmsVideo Laryngoscopy for ET placement, Direct Laryngoscopy for ET Placement
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Evolution of videolaryngoscopy in pediatric population.Journal of anaesthesiology, clinical pharmacology
    Review
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Krithika LingappanSection of Neonatology, Department of Pediatrics, Baylor College of Medicine, 6621 Fannin Street (WT 6-104), Houston, Texas, USA, 77030.
Jennifer L Arnold
Thomas L Shaw
Caraciolo J Fernandes
Mohan Pammi
Baylor College of Medicine · USTexas Children's Hospital · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEstablishment of secure airway is a critical part of neonatal resuscitation both in the delivery room and in the neonatal unit. Videolaryngoscopy is a new technique that has the potential to facilitate successful endotracheal intubation and decrease adverse consequences of delay in airway stabilization. Videolaryngoscopy may enhance visualization of the glottis and intubation success in neonates.

objectivesTo determine the efficacy and safety of videolaryngoscopy compared to direct laryngoscopy in decreasing the time and attempts required and increasing the success rate for endotracheal intubation in neonates. SEARCH

methodsWe used the search strategy of the Cochrane Neonatal Review Group. We searched for randomized controlled trials evaluating videolaryngoscopy for neonatal endotracheal intubation in May 2013 in the electronic databases; the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL); MEDLINE; EMBASE; CINAHL; abstracts of the Pediatric Academic Societies; websites for registered trials at www.clinicaltrials.gov and www.controlled-trials.com; and in the reference lists of relevant studies. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomized or quasi-randomized trials in neonates evaluating videolaryngoscopy for endotracheal intubation compared with direct laryngoscopy. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Review authors performed data collection and analysis as recommended by the Cochrane Neonatal Review Group. Two review authors (KL and MP) independently assessed studies identified by the search strategy for inclusion. MAIN

resultsOur search strategy performed in May 2013 yielded 7057 references. Two review authors (MP and KL) independently assessed all references for inclusion. We did not find any completed studies for inclusion but identified three ongoing trials and one study awaiting classification. AUTHORS'

conclusionsThere was insufficient evidence to recommend or refute the use of videolaryngoscopy for endotracheal intubation in neonates. Well-designed, adequately powered randomized controlled studies are necessary to address efficacy and safety of videolaryngoscopy for endotracheal intubation in neonates.

Indexed as

ResuscitationHumansInfant, NewbornIntubation, IntratrachealLaryngoscopy

Identifiers

PMID25691129
OpenAlexW4241953582

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.