Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25691111›Full record

SynthesisJournal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract2015

Is antisecretory therapy after pancreatoduodenectomy necessary? Meta-analysis and contemporary practices of pancreatic surgeons.

James R Butler, Tyrone Rogers, George Eckart, Gregory R Martens, Eugene P Ceppa, Michael G House, Attila Nakeeb, C Max Schmidt, Nicholas J Zyromski

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Journal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 38% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Randomized Trial of Pylorus-Preserving vs. Pylorus-Resecting Pancreatoduodenectomy: Long-Term Morbidity and Quality of Life.Journal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract · 2020
    Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

James R ButlerDepartment of Surgery, Indiana University School of Medicine-IU Health University Hospital, 550 N University Blvd #1295, Indianapolis, IN, 46202, USA.
Tyrone Rogers
George Eckart
Gregory R Martens
Eugene P Ceppa
Michael G House
Attila Nakeeb
C Max Schmidt
Nicholas J Zyromski
Indiana University – Purdue University Indianapolis · USIndiana University · USIndiana University School of MedicineIndiana University Hospital · USUniversity School · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMarginal ulcer (MU) is a well-described complication of pancreatoduodenectomy (PD) whose incidence remains unclear. Gastric antisecretory medications likely attenuate the risk of marginal ulceration after PD; however, the true relationship between antisecretory medication and marginal ulceration after PD is not precisely known. The aims of this study were to document the incidence of MU after PD, identify any relationship between MU and gastric antisecretory medication, and survey current practice of MU prophylaxis among experienced pancreatic surgeons.

methodsthe MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Central Registrar of Controlled Trials, and Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews databases were searched from their inception to May 2014 for abstracts documenting ulceration after pancreatoduodenectomy. Two reviewers independently graded abstracts for inclusion in this review. Contemporary practice was assessed through a four-question survey distributed globally to 200 established pancreatic surgeons.

resultsAfter a review of 208 abstracts, 54 studies were graded as relevant. These represented a cohort of 212 patients with marginal ulcer after PD (n = 4794). A meta-analysis of the included references shows mean incidence of ulceration after PD of 2.5% (confidence interval (CI) 1.8-3.2%) with a median time to diagnosis of 15.5 months. Pylorus preservation was associated with a MU rate of 2.0% (CI 1.0-2.9%), while "classic" PD procedures report an overall rate of 2.6% (CI 1.6-3.6%). Documented use of postoperative antisecretory medication was associated with a reduced rate of 1.4% (CI 0.1-1.7%). One hundred forty-four of 200 (72%) surveys were returned, from which it was determined that 92% of pancreatic surgeons have dealt with this complication, and 86% routinely prescribe prophylactic antisecretory medication after PD.

conclusionsThe incidence of MU after PD is 2.5% with a median time to occurrence of 15.5 months postoperatively. Gastric antisecretory medication prescription may affect the incidence of MU. The majority of pancreatic surgeons surveyed have encountered MU after PD; most (86%) routinely prescribe prophylactic gastric antisecretory medication.

Indexed as

Anti-Ulcer AgentsHistamine H2 AntagonistsHumansIncidencePancreaticoduodenectomyPeptic UlcerPractice Patterns, Physicians'Proton Pump InhibitorsAnti-Ulcer AgentsHistamine H2 AntagonistsProton Pump Inhibitors

Identifiers

PMID25691111
OpenAlexW2013325719

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.