Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25690930›Full record

ArticleEnvironmental health perspectives2015

Examination of the safety of pediatric vaccine schedules in a non-human primate model: assessments of neurodevelopment, learning, and social behavior.

Britni Curtis, Noelle Liberato, Megan Rulien, Kelly Morrisroe, Caroline Kenney, Vernon Yutuc, Clayton Ferrier, C Nathan Marti, Dorothy Mandell, Thomas M Burbacher and 2 more

RetractedErratum issuedOpen access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Environmental health perspectives, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It has been retracted, and should not be counted. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
6.0field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Nonhuman primate models of pediatric viral diseases.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2024
    Review
  2. Evidence on Neurotoxicity after Intrauterine and Childhood Exposure to Organomercurials.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Britni CurtisInfant Primate Research Laboratory, Washington National Primate Research Center, Seattle, Washington, USA.
Noelle Liberato
Megan Rulien
Kelly Morrisroe
Caroline Kenney
Vernon Yutuc
Clayton Ferrier
C Nathan Marti
Dorothy Mandell
Thomas M Burbacher
Gene P Sackett
Laura Hewitson
Austin Independent School District · USJohnson Center for Child Health and Development · USUniversity of Washington · US

Funding

Washington National Primate Research CenterP51OD010425 · OD · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI Mari Ostendorf · 2012 to 2026
$201.8M
YILMA SIV VACCINIA VACCINE TRIALP51RR000166 · NCRR · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI BAILLIE, THOMAS ALLAN · 1985 to 2011
$161.1M
Restoring FMRP Phenotypes Frpm Temporal Regional and Splice- Isoforms VarationsP30HD002274 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI GURALNICK, MICHAEL J · 1985 to 2013
$33.6M
Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities Research CenterU54HD083091 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI DOHERTY, DANIEL · 2014 to 2019
$7.9M
NCRR NIH HHS P51 RR000166NCRR NIH HHS RR0166NICHD NIH HHS HD02274NICHD NIH HHS P30 HD002274NICHD NIH HHS U54 HD083091NIH HHS P51 OD010425
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn the 1990s, the mercury-based preservative thimerosal was used in most pediatric vaccines. Although there are currently only two thimerosal-containing vaccines (TCVs) recommended for pediatric use, parental perceptions that vaccines pose safety concerns are affecting vaccination rates, particularly in light of the much expanded and more complex schedule in place today.

objectivesThe objective of this study was to examine the safety of pediatric vaccine schedules in a non-human primate model.

methodsWe administered vaccines to six groups of infant male rhesus macaques (n = 12-16/group) using a standardized thimerosal dose where appropriate. Study groups included the recommended 1990s Pediatric vaccine schedule, an accelerated 1990s Primate schedule with or without the measles-mumps-rubella (MMR) vaccine, the MMR vaccine only, and the expanded 2008 schedule. We administered saline injections to age-matched control animals (n = 16). Infant development was assessed from birth to 12 months of age by examining the acquisition of neonatal reflexes, the development of object concept permanence (OCP), computerized tests of discrimination learning, and infant social behavior. Data were analyzed using analysis of variance, multilevel modeling, and survival analyses, where appropriate.

resultsWe observed no group differences in the acquisition of OCP. During discrimination learning, animals receiving TCVs had improved performance on reversal testing, although some of these same animals showed poorer performance in subsequent learning-set testing. Analysis of social and nonsocial behaviors identified few instances of negative behaviors across the entire infancy period. Although some group differences in specific behaviors were reported at 2 months of age, by 12 months all infants, irrespective of vaccination status, had developed the typical repertoire of macaque behaviors.

conclusionsThis comprehensive 5-year case-control study, which closely examined the effects of pediatric vaccines on early primate development, provided no consistent evidence of neurodevelopmental deficits or aberrant behavior in vaccinated animals.

Indexed as

Immunization ScheduleSocial BehaviorAnimalsCase-Control StudiesLearningMacaca mulattaMaleModels, AnimalNeurodevelopmental DisordersNeurotoxinsPreservatives, PharmaceuticalThimerosalVaccinesNeurotoxinsPreservatives, PharmaceuticalThimerosalVaccines

Identifiers

PMID25690930
PMCPMC4455585
OpenAlexW2005410910

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC0
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.