Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25690897›Full record

ArticleNucleic acids research2015

Accurate multiplexing and filtering for high-throughput amplicon-sequencing.

Philippe Esling, Franck Lejzerowicz, Jan Pawlowski

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nucleic acids research, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 90 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
90citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

90 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Nanopore sequencing of PCR products enables multicopy gene family reconstruction.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2023
    Article

30 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Philippe EslingDepartment of Genetics and Evolution, University of Geneva, Sciences 3, 30, Quai Ernest Ansermet, CH-1211 Geneva 4, Switzerland IRCAM, UMR 9912, Université Pierre et Marie Curie, Paris, France philippe.esling@unige.ch.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1655-7909
Franck LejzerowiczDepartment of Genetics and Evolution, University of Geneva, Sciences 3, 30, Quai Ernest Ansermet, CH-1211 Geneva 4, Switzerland.
Jan PawlowskiDepartment of Genetics and Evolution, University of Geneva, Sciences 3, 30, Quai Ernest Ansermet, CH-1211 Geneva 4, Switzerland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Tagging amplicons with tag sequences appended to PCR primers allow the multiplexing of numerous samples for high-throughput sequencing (HTS). This approach is routinely used in HTS-based diversity analyses, especially in microbial ecology and biomedical diagnostics. However, amplicon library preparation is subject to pervasive sample sequence cross-contaminations as a result of tag switching events referred to as mistagging. Here, we sequenced seven amplicon libraries prepared using various multiplexing designs in order to measure the magnitude of this phenomenon and its impact on diversity analyses. Up to 28.2% of the unique sequences correspond to undetectable (critical) mistags in single- or saturated double-tagging libraries. We show the advantage of multiplexing samples following Latin Square Designs in order to optimize the detection of mistags and maximize the information on their distribution across samples. We use this information in designs incorporating PCR replicates to filter the critical mistags and to recover the exact composition of mock community samples. Being parameter-free and data-driven, our approach can provide more accurate and reproducible HTS data sets, improving the reliability of their interpretations.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsGene LibraryComputer SimulationDNA PrimersHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingInternetMultiplex Polymerase Chain ReactionReproducibility of ResultsSoftwareDNA Primers

Identifiers

PMID25690897
PMCPMC4357712

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.