Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25690721›Full record

ReviewHuman cell2015

Cellular senescence: a hitchhiker's guide.

Aloysious Aravinthan

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Human cell, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. [Advances in inflammaging in liver disease].Zhejiang da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Zhejiang University. Medical sciences · 2025
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Magnesium and Liver Metabolism Through the Lifespan.Advances in nutrition (Bethesda, Md.) · 2023
    Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Skin Aging, Cellular Senescence and Natural Polyphenols.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. The Resistance ofAntioxidants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Aloysious AravinthanDepartment of Medicine, University of Cambridge, Box 156, Hills Road, Cambridge, CB2 0QQ, UK, a.d.aravinthan@cantab.net.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Since its first description over 50 years ago, cellular senescence has gained increasing attention. The number of research publications on cellular senescence last year alone is more than the number of publications in the decade in 1990s. Laboratories solely studying senescence, scientific conferences and organisations dedicated to field of cellular senescence are also on the rise. These not only indicate the growing interest in this field but also highlight the importance of cellular senescence in cell biology from yeast to human. Cellular senescence is implicated in normal ageing, tumour suppression, tumourigenesis, chronic diseases and more recently, in embryogenesis. Thus, understanding senescence is crucial for the understanding of organismal biology. In addition, understanding of cellular senescence will be invaluable in the development of therapeutic targets in the fight against age-related comorbidities, cancer and chronic disease progression.

Indexed as

Cellular SenescenceAgingAnimalsCell CycleCellular MicroenvironmentChronic DiseaseDNA DamageHumansNeoplasmsOxidative StressRetinoblastoma ProteinSignal TransductionTelomeraseTelomereTumor Suppressor Protein p53Retinoblastoma ProteinTelomeraseTumor Suppressor Protein p53

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.