ArticleJournal of the American College of Surgeons2015
Development and validation of a risk stratification score for ventral incisional hernia after abdominal surgery: hernia expectation rates in intra-abdominal surgery (the HERNIA Project).
Article in Journal of the American College of Surgeons, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 4 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 86 papers, 10 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Tissue Reinforcement of Incisional Closure Among High Risk Patients
The Mesh-RTL Project for Prevention of Incisional Hernia: Clinical Trial of Non-inferiority to Compare Two Aponeurotic Closure Techniques in Midline Laparotomy in Patients With Elevated Risk for Hernia
Prophylactic Mesh Reinforcement After Open Aortic Aneurysm Repair: a Retrospective Study
Prevention of Postoperative Hernias in Emergency Surgery
Who cites it
86 citing papers in PubMed, 10 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 197 citations in OpenAlex.
- Comparative Outcomes of Reinforced Tension-Line Sutures Versus Standard Closure Techniques in Patients Undergoing Laparotomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.ANZ journal of surgery · 2026Pooled it
- The impact of simultaneous panniculectomy in ventral hernia repair: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery · 2024Pooled it
- Prophylactic mesh augmentation after laparotomy for elective and emergency surgery: meta-analysis.BJS open · 2023Pooled it
- Prophylactic mesh reinforcement for midline incisional hernia prevention: systematic review and updated meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery · 2023Pooled it
- Fascial Dehiscence and Incisional Hernia Prediction Models: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.World journal of surgery · 2022Pooled it
- Updated guideline for closure of abdominal wall incisions from the European and American Hernia Societies.The British journal of surgery · 2022Pooled it
- Comparing different modalities for the diagnosis of incisional hernia: a systematic review.Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery · 2018Pooled it
- Single-incision surgery trocar-site hernia: an updated systematic review meta-analysis with trial sequential analysis by the Minimally Invasive Surgery Synthesis of Interventions Outcomes Network (MISSION).Surgical endoscopy · 2018Pooled it
- Closure methods for laparotomy incisions for preventing incisional hernias and other wound complications.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2017Pooled it
- Component Separation vs. Bridged Repair for Large Ventral Hernias: A Multi-Institutional Risk-Adjusted Comparison, Systematic Review, and Meta-Analysis.Surgical infections · 2016Pooled it
- Trial
- A postoperative body weight increase is a novel risk factor for incisional hernia of midline abdominal incision after elective gastroenterological surgery.Langenbeck's archives of surgery · 2023Trial
- Continuous versus interrupted abdominal wall closure after emergency midline laparotomy: CONTINT: a randomized controlled trial [NCT00544583].World journal of emergency surgery : WJES · 2023Trial
- Randomized controlled trial comparing cosmetic results of midline incision versus off-midline incision for specimen extraction in laparoscopic colectomy.Langenbeck's archives of surgery · 2023Trial
- Prevention of incisional hernia with a reinforced tension line (RTL) versus primary suture only in midline laparotomies: 3-year follow-up in a randomized clinical trial.Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery · 2022Trial
- Importance of the physical exam: double-blind randomized controlled trial of radiologic interpretation of ventral hernias after selective clinical information.Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery · 2019Trial
- Trial
- Giant ventral hernia-relationship between abdominal wall muscle strength and hernia area.BMC surgery · 2016Trial
- Surgical Complexity and Postoperative Outcomes in Recurrent Versus Primary Incisional Hernias Following Elective Retromuscular Repair: A Retrospective Cohort Study.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Barbed continuous suture reduces the risk of specimen extraction site hernia in high-risk obese patients: a CT-based analysis.Surgical endoscopy · 2026Article
26 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
- Commented on byDiscussion.2015
Authors and funding
11 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundVentral incisional hernias (VIH) develop in up to 20% of patients after abdominal surgery. No widely applicable preoperative risk-assessment tool exists. We aimed to develop and validate a risk-assessment tool to predict VIH after abdominal surgery. STUDY
designA prospective study of all patients undergoing abdominal surgery was conducted at a single institution from 2008 to 2010. Variables were defined in accordance with the National Surgical Quality Improvement Project, and VIH was determined through clinical and radiographic evaluation. A multivariate Cox proportional hazard model was built from a development cohort (2008 to 2009) to identify predictors of VIH. The HERNIAscore was created by converting the hazards ratios (HR) to points. The predictive accuracy was assessed on the validation cohort (2010) using a receiver operator characteristic curve and calculating the area under the curve (AUC).
resultsOf 625 patients followed for a median of 41 months (range 0.3 to 64 months), 93 (13.9%) developed a VIH. The training cohort (n = 428, VIH = 70, 16.4%) identified 4 independent predictors: laparotomy (HR 4.77, 95% CI 2.61 to 8.70) or hand-assisted laparoscopy (HAL, HR 4.00, 95% CI 2.08 to 7.70), COPD (HR 2.35; 95% CI 1.44 to 3.83), and BMI ≥ 25 kg/m(2) (HR1.74; 95% CI 1.04 to 2.91). Factors that were not predictive included age, sex, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score, albumin, immunosuppression, previous surgery, and suture material or technique. The predictive score had an AUC = 0.77 (95% CI 0.68 to 0.86) using the validation cohort (n = 197, VIH = 23, 11.6%). Using the HERNIAscore: HERNIAscore = 4(∗)Laparotomy+3(∗)HAL+1(∗)COPD+1(∗) BMI ≥ 25, 3 classes stratified the risk of VIH: class I (0 to 3 points),5.2%; class II (4 to 5 points),19.6%; and class III (6 points), 55.0%.
conclusionsThe HERNIAscore accurately identifies patients at increased risk for VIH. Although external validation is needed, this provides a starting point to counsel patients and guide clinical decisions. Increasing the use of laparoscopy, weight-loss programs, community smoking prevention programs, and incisional reinforcement may help reduce rates of VIH.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.