ReviewDer Urologe. Ausg. A2015
[Neurogenic bladder function disorders in patients with meningomyelocele: S2k guidelines on diagnostics and therapy].
Review in Der Urologe. Ausg. A, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- A New Rat Model of Sacral Cord Injury Producing a Neurogenic Bladder and Its Functional and Mechanistic Studies.Biomolecules · 2024Article
- Importance of urodynamic evaluation of bladder function after secondary untethering in spina bifida patients: single center experience of 30 years.Pediatric surgery international · 2022Article
- Functional, morphological and molecular characteristics in a novel rat model of spinal sacral nerve injury-surgical approach, pathological process and clinical relevance.Scientific reports · 2022Article
- Improvement of bladder function after bladder augmentation surgery: a report of 26 years of clinical experience.Pediatric surgery international · 2022Article
- Current Indications and Techniques for the Use of Bowel Segments in Pediatric Urinary Tract Reconstruction.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2019Review
- Pharmacotherapy for Pediatric Neurogenic Bladder.Paediatric drugs · 2017Review
- [Bladder augmentation and urinary diversion in children and adolescents].Der Urologe. Ausg. A · 2016Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
18 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The treatment of children and adolescents with meningomyelocele has experienced a clear change in the last 30 years. The establishment of pharmacotherapy, clean intermittent catheterization (CIC) and infection prophylaxis have improved the prognosis for patients and have led to new therapeutic strategies. The interdisciplinary cooperation between neonatologists, neurosurgeons, pediatric neurologists, pediatric urologists, pediatric nephrologists, pediatric orthopedists and pediatric surgeons leads to optimization of individualized therapy. These guidelines present definitions and classifications, investigations and timing which are described in detail. The conservative and operative therapy options for neurogenic bladder function disorders are described and discussed with reference to the current literature. The brief overview provides in each case assistance for the treating physician in the care of this patient group and facilitates the interdisciplinary cooperation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
25690576What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.