Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25690545›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging2015

Cortical activity during olfactory stimulation in multiple chemical sensitivity: a (18)F-FDG PET/CT study.

Agostino Chiaravalloti, Marco Pagani, Alessandro Micarelli, Barbara Di Pietro, Giuseppe Genovesi, Marco Alessandrini, Orazio Schillaci

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03732092 (The Effects of Olfactory Stimulation on Diagnosis and Prognosis of Patients With Disorders of Consciousness), which is not on this map. Cited by 24 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03732092 completednot on this mapstarted 2018, after this paper: background citation

The Effects of Olfactory Stimulation on Diagnosis and Prognosis of Patients With Disorders of Consciousness

TypeobservationalSponsorJing WangRan2018 to 2019Enrolled20ConditionsMinimally Conscious State, Vegetative StateArmsComa Recovery Scale-Revised
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 38 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Italian Expert Consensus on Clinical and Therapeutic Management of Multiple Chemical Sensitivity (MCS).International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. [Application research and development of objective examination of olfactory function].Lin chuang er bi yan hou tou jing wai ke za zhi = Journal of clinical otorhinolaryngology head and neck surgery · 2022
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Altered glucose metabolism of the olfactory-related cortices in anosmia patients with traumatic brain injury.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2021
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Multiple Chemical Sensitivity Syndrome: A Principal Component Analysis of Symptoms.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. PET and SPECT in psychiatry: the past and the future.European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2019
    Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Cerebral metabolic changes related to clinical parameters in idiopathic anosmic patients during olfactory stimulation: a pilot investigation.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2017
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Agostino ChiaravallotiDepartment of Biomedicine and Prevention, University Tor Vergata, Rome, Italy, agostino.chiaravalloti@gmail.com.
Marco Pagani
Alessandro Micarelli
Barbara Di Pietro
Giuseppe Genovesi
Marco Alessandrini
Orazio Schillaci
University of Rome Tor Vergata · ITInstitute of Cognitive Sciences and Technologies · ITSapienza University of Rome · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo investigate the differences in brain glucose consumption during olfactory stimulation between subjects affected by multiple chemical sensitivity (MCS) and a group of healthy individuals.

methodsTwo (18)F-FDG PET/CT scans were performed in 26 subjects (6 men and 20 women; mean age 46.7 ± 11 years) with a clinical diagnosis of MCS and in 11 healthy controls (6 women and 5 men; mean age 45.7 ± 11 years), the first scan after a neutral olfactory stimulation (NS) and the second after a pure olfactory stimulation (OS). Differences in (18)F-FDG uptake were analysed by statistical parametric mapping (SPM2).

resultsIn controls OS led to an increase in glucose consumption in BA 18 and 19 and a reduction in glucose metabolism in BA 10, 11, 32 and 47. In MCS subjects, OS led to an increase in glucose consumption in BA 20, 23, 18 and 37 and a reduction in glucose metabolism in BA 8, 9 and 10.

conclusionThe results of our study suggest that cortical activity in subjects with MCS differs from that in healthy individuals during olfactory stimulation.

Indexed as

Positron-Emission TomographySmellAdultFemaleFluorodeoxyglucose F18HumansMaleMiddle AgedMultimodal ImagingOdorantsOlfactory CortexRadiopharmaceuticalsTomography, X-Ray ComputedFluorodeoxyglucose F18Radiopharmaceuticals

Identifiers

PMID25690545
OpenAlexW2000500263

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.