Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25690512›Full record

ReviewThe Plant journal : for cell and molecular biology2015

The Chlamydomonas cell cycle.

Frederick R Cross, James G Umen

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The Plant journal : for cell and molecular biology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 107 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
107citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

107 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. The Elements of Life, Photosynthesis and Genomics.Journal of molecular biology · 2025
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Sensing a rainbow of colors: algal photoreceptors.Frontiers in plant science · 2025
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Uncoupling growth and division inISME communications · 2025
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review

47 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Frederick R CrossThe Rockefeller University, New York, NY, 10065, USA.
James G UmenDonald Danforth Plant Science Center, St. Louis, MO, 63132, USA.

Funding

Sources and Consequences of noise in cell cycle regulationR01GM078153 · NIGMS · ROCKEFELLER UNIVERSITY · PI CROSS, FREDERICK R. · 2006 to 2019
$3.3M
Evolution of Sexually Dimorphic Germ Cells in Volvox carteriR01GM078376 · NIGMS · SALK INSTITUTE FOR BIOLOGICAL STUDIES · PI UMEN, JAMES GREG · 2006 to 2014
$3.3M
A New Paradigm for Cell Size Control by the RB Tumor Suppressor PathwayR01GM092744 · NIGMS · DONALD DANFORTH PLANT SCIENCE CENTER · PI UMEN, JAMES GREG · 2011 to 2014
$1.2M
NIGMS NIH HHS 1R0 GM078376NIGMS NIH HHS 5R01GM078153-07NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM078153NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM078376NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM092744
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The position of Chlamydomonas within the eukaryotic phylogeny makes it a unique model in at least two important ways: as a representative of the critically important, early-diverging lineage leading to plants; and as a microbe retaining important features of the last eukaryotic common ancestor (LECA) that has been lost in the highly studied yeast lineages. Its cell biology has been studied for many decades and it has well-developed experimental genetic tools, both classical (Mendelian) and molecular. Unlike land plants, it is a haploid with very few gene duplicates, making it ideal for loss-of-function genetic studies. The Chlamydomonas cell cycle has a striking temporal and functional separation between cell growth and rapid cell division, probably connected to the interplay between diurnal cycles that drive photosynthetic cell growth and the cell division cycle; it also exhibits a highly choreographed interaction between the cell cycle and its centriole-basal body-flagellar cycle. Here, we review the current status of studies of the Chlamydomonas cell cycle. We begin with an overview of cell-cycle control in the well-studied yeast and animal systems, which has yielded a canonical, well-supported model. We discuss briefly what is known about similarities and differences in plant cell-cycle control, compared with this model. We next review the cytology and cell biology of the multiple-fission cell cycle of Chlamydomonas. Lastly, we review recent genetic approaches and insights into Chlamydomonas cell-cycle regulation that have been enabled by a new generation of genomics-based tools.

Indexed as

AnimalsCell CycleChlamydomonasCytokinesisGene Expression RegulationMutationPhylogenyPlantsViridiplantaecell-cycle mutantChlamydomonas reinhardtiicytokinesismitosismultiple fissionphycoplastVolvocine algae

Identifiers

PMID25690512
PMCPMC4409525

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.