Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25690415›Full record

ReviewProteomics2015

Visualization of proteomics data using R and bioconductor.

Laurent Gatto, Lisa M Breckels, Thomas Naake, Sebastian Gibb

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Proteomics, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Lipoteichoic Acid fromNutrients · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. High-throughput proteomics: a methodological mini-review.Laboratory investigation; a journal of technical methods and pathology · 2022
    Review
  15. Scaling Up Single-Cell Proteomics.Molecular & cellular proteomics : MCP · 2022
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Subcellular proteomics.Nature reviews. Methods primers · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Laurent GattoDepartment of Biochemistry, Cambridge Centre for Proteomics, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK; Department of Biochemistry, Computational Proteomics Unit, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Lisa M Breckels
Thomas Naake
Sebastian Gibb

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/K00137X/1Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/L002817/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Data visualization plays a key role in high-throughput biology. It is an essential tool for data exploration allowing to shed light on data structure and patterns of interest. Visualization is also of paramount importance as a form of communicating data to a broad audience. Here, we provided a short overview of the application of the R software to the visualization of proteomics data. We present a summary of R's plotting systems and how they are used to visualize and understand raw and processed MS-based proteomics data.

Indexed as

SoftwareAnimalsComputer GraphicsHumansMass SpectrometryMolecular Sequence AnnotationProteomicsBioconductorBioinformaticsData analysisProgrammingRVisualization

Identifiers

PMID25690415
PMCPMC4510819

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.