ArticleClinical orthopaedics and related research2015
Women Build Long Bones With Less Cortical Mass Relative to Body Size and Bone Size Compared With Men.
Article in Clinical orthopaedics and related research, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
18 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.
- Sexual Dimorphism in the Musculoskeletal System: Sex Hormones and Beyond.Journal of the Endocrine Society · 2024Review
- Age-dependent change and intraskeletal variability in secondary osteons of elderly Australians.Journal of anatomy · 2024Article
- Structural differences contributing to sex-specific associations between FN BMD and whole-bone strength for adult White women and men.JBMR plus · 2024Article
- Variation and covariation of external shape and cross-sectional geometry in the human metacarpus.American journal of biological anthropology · 2024Article
- Characterizing Bone Phenotypes Related to Skeletal Fragility Using Advanced Medical Imaging.Current osteoporosis reports · 2023Review
- Advancing Osteoporosis Evaluation Procedures: Detailed Computational Analysis of Regional Structural Vulnerabilities in Osteoporotic Bone.Journal of personalized medicine · 2023Article
- Sex and External Size Specific Limitations in Assessing Bone Health From Adult Hand Radiographs.JBMR plus · 2022Article
- Bone Microarchitecture Phenotypes Identified in Older Adults Are Associated With Different Levels of Osteoporotic Fracture Risk.Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research · 2022Article
- Application of Methods for a Morphological Analysis of the Femoral Diaphysis Based on Clinical CT Images to Prehistoric Human Bone: Comparison of Modern Japanese and Jomon Populations from Hegi Cave, Oita, Japan.BioMed research international · 2022Article
- Article
- Evolutionary Perspectives on the Developing Skeleton and Implications for Lifelong Health.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2020Review
- Morphological profile of atypical femoral fractures: age-related changes to the cross-sectional geometry of the diaphysis.Journal of anatomy · 2019Article
- Histomorphometry and cortical robusticity of the adult human femur.Journal of bone and mineral metabolism · 2019Article
- Differential Adaptive Response of Growing Bones From Two Female Inbred Mouse Strains to Voluntary Cage-Wheel Running.JBMR plus · 2018Article
- Tibia functionality and Division II female and male collegiate athletes from multiple sports.PeerJ · 2018Article
- Canalization Leads to Similar Whole Bone Mechanical Function at Maturity in Two Inbred Strains of Mice.Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research · 2017Article
- How Does Bone Strength Compare Across Sex, Site, and Ethnicity?Clinical orthopaedics and related research · 2015Article
- Establishing biomechanical mechanisms in mouse models: practical guidelines for systematically evaluating phenotypic changes in the diaphyses of long bones.Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research · 2015Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe twofold greater lifetime risk of fracturing a bone for white women compared with white men and black women has been attributed in part to differences in how the skeletal system accumulates bone mass during growth. On average, women build more slender long bones with less cortical area compared with men. Although slender bones are known to have a naturally lower cortical area compared with wider bones, it remains unclear whether the relatively lower cortical area of women is consistent with their increased slenderness or is reduced beyond that expected for the sex-specific differences in bone size and body size. Whether this sexual dimorphism is consistent with ethnic background and is recapitulated in the widely used mouse model also remains unclear. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: We asked (1) do black women build bones with reduced cortical area compared with black men; (2) do white women build bones with reduced cortical area compared with white men; and (3) do female mice build bones with reduced cortical area compared with male mice?
methodsBone strength and cross-sectional morphology of adult human and mouse bone were calculated from quantitative CT images of the femoral midshaft. The data were tested for normality and regression analyses were used to test for differences in cortical area between men and women after adjusting for body size and bone size by general linear model (GLM).
resultsLinear regression analysis showed that the femurs of black women had 11% lower cortical area compared with those of black men after adjusting for body size and bone size (women: mean=357.7 mm2; 95% confidence interval [CI], 347.9-367.5 mm2; men: mean=400.1 mm2; 95% CI, 391.5-408.7 mm2; effect size=1.2; p<0.001, GLM). Likewise, the femurs of white women had 12% less cortical area compared with those of white men after adjusting for body size and bone size (women: mean=350.1 mm2; 95% CI, 340.4-359.8 mm2; men: mean=394.3 mm2; 95% CI, 386.5-402.1 mm2; effect size=1.3; p<0.001, GLM). In contrast, female and male femora from recombinant inbred mouse strains showed the opposite trend; femurs from female mice had a 4% larger cortical area compared with those of male mice after adjusting for body size and bone size (female: mean=0.73 mm2; 95% CI, 0.71-0.74 mm2; male: mean=0.70 mm2; 95% CI, 0.68-0.71 mm2; effect size=0.74; p=0.04, GLM).
conclusionsFemale femurs are not simply a more slender version of male femurs. Women acquire substantially less mass (cortical area) for their body size and bone size compared with men. Our analysis questions whether mouse long bone is a suitable model to study human sexual dimorphism. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Identifying differences in the way bones are constructed may be clinically important for developing sex-specific diagnostics and treatment strategies to reduce fragility fractures.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.