Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25690085›Full record

ReviewTherapeutic delivery2015

Pain management via local anesthetics and responsive hydrogels.

Kyle R Bagshaw, Curt L Hanenbaum, Erica J Carbone, Kevin W H Lo, Cato T Laurencin, Joseph Walker, Lakshmi S Nair

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Therapeutic delivery, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 30% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 57 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. [Sterile puncture of large joints].Operative Orthopadie und Traumatologie · 2023
    Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Kyle R BagshawDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT 06269, USA.
Curt L Hanenbaum
Erica J Carbone
Kevin W H Lo
Cato T Laurencin
Joseph Walker
Lakshmi S Nair
UConn Health · USCalifornia Institute for Regenerative Medicine · USUniversity of Connecticut · US

Funding

Novel Injectable Analgesic Delivery System for Chronic Musculoskeletal Pain ManagR21AR066320 · NIAMS · UNIVERSITY OF CONNECTICUT SCH OF MED/DNT · PI LO, WAI HONG, NAIR, LAKSHMI S · 2014 to 2016
$483k
NIAMS NIH HHS AR066320NIAMS NIH HHS R21 AR066320
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Acute and chronic pain control is a significant clinical challenge that has been largely unmet. Local anesthetics are widely used for the control of post-operative pain and in the therapy of acute and chronic pain. While a variety of approaches are currently used to prolong the duration of action of local anesthetics, an optimal strategy to achieve neural blockage for several hours to days with minimal toxicity has yet to be identified. Several drug delivery systems such as liposomes, microparticles and nanoparticles have been investigated as local anesthetic delivery vehicles to achieve prolonged anesthesia. Recently, injectable responsive hydrogels raise significant interest for the localized delivery of anesthetic molecules. This paper discusses the potential of injectable hydrogels to prolong the action of local anesthetics.

Indexed as

Acute PainAnesthetics, LocalAnimalsChronic PainDelayed-Action PreparationsDrug Delivery SystemsDrug DesignHumansHydrogelsInjectionsPostoperative PainAnesthetics, LocalDelayed-Action PreparationsHydrogels

Identifiers

PMID25690085
PMCPMC4500150
OpenAlexW1969675091

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.