Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25689864›Full record

ArticlePloS one2015

A simple method for encapsulating single cells in alginate microspheres allows for direct PCR and whole genome amplification.

Saharnaz Bigdeli, Roger O Dettloff, Curtis W Frank, Ronald W Davis, Laurel D Crosby

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Saharnaz BigdeliStanford Genome Technology Center, Department of Biochemistry, Stanford University, 3165 Porter Drive, Palo Alto, CA 94304, United States of America; Department of Chemical Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, United States of America.
Roger O DettloffStanford Genome Technology Center, Department of Biochemistry, Stanford University, 3165 Porter Drive, Palo Alto, CA 94304, United States of America; Caerus Molecular Diagnostics, Mountain View, CA, United States of America.
Curtis W FrankDepartment of Chemical Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, United States of America.
Ronald W DavisStanford Genome Technology Center, Department of Biochemistry, Stanford University, 3165 Porter Drive, Palo Alto, CA 94304, United States of America.
Laurel D CrosbyStanford Genome Technology Center, Department of Biochemistry, Stanford University, 3165 Porter Drive, Palo Alto, CA 94304, United States of America.
Stanford University · USCaerus Molecular Diagnostics (United States) · US

Funding

Isolation Selection and Polony Amplification of Single Cells in a Gel MatrixR21HG005820 · NHGRI · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI DAVIS, RONALD WAYNE · 2010 to 2011
$438k
NHGRI NIH HHS 1R21 HG005820NHGRI NIH HHS R21 HG005820
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Microdroplets are an effective platform for segregating individual cells and amplifying DNA. However, a key challenge is to recover the contents of individual droplets for downstream analysis. This paper offers a method for embedding cells in alginate microspheres and performing multiple serial operations on the isolated cells. Rhodobacter sphaeroides cells were diluted in alginate polymer and sprayed into microdroplets using a fingertip aerosol sprayer. The encapsulated cells were lysed and subjected either to conventional PCR, or whole genome amplification using either multiple displacement amplification (MDA) or a two-step PCR protocol. Microscopic examination after PCR showed that the lumen of the occupied microspheres contained fluorescently stained DNA product, but multiple displacement amplification with phi29 produced only a small number of polymerase colonies. The 2-step WGA protocol was successful in generating fluorescent material, and quantitative PCR from DNA extracted from aliquots of microspheres suggested that the copy number inside the microspheres was amplified up to 3 orders of magnitude. Microspheres containing fluorescent material were sorted by a dilution series and screened with a fluorescent plate reader to identify single microspheres. The DNA was extracted from individual isolates, re-amplified with full-length sequencing adapters, and then a single isolate was sequenced using the Illumina MiSeq platform. After filtering the reads, the only sequences that collectively matched a genome in the NCBI nucleotide database belonged to R. sphaeroides. This demonstrated that sequencing-ready DNA could be generated from the contents of a single microsphere without culturing. However, the 2-step WGA strategy showed limitations in terms of low genome coverage and an uneven frequency distribution of reads across the genome. This paper offers a simple method for embedding cells in alginate microspheres and performing PCR on isolated cells in common bulk reactions, although further work must be done to improve the amplification coverage of single genomes.

Indexed as

MicrospheresAlginatesCapsulesCell SeparationFeasibility StudiesGenome, BacterialGlucuronic AcidHexuronic AcidsPolymerase Chain ReactionRhodobacter sphaeroidesSequence Analysis, DNAAlginatesCapsulesGlucuronic AcidHexuronic Acids

Identifiers

PMID25689864
PMCPMC4331554
OpenAlexW2041550043

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.