Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25689420›Full record

ArticleJournal of athletic training2015

A high-intensity, intermittent exercise protocol and dynamic postural control in men and women.

Enda Whyte, Aoife Burke, Elaine White, Kieran Moran

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of athletic training, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Does induced fatigue alter dynamic balance in athletes? A systematic review.The Journal of the Canadian Chiropractic Association · 2021
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Enda WhyteSchool of Health and Human Performance, Dublin City University, Ireland.
Aoife Burke
Elaine White
Kieran Moran

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

contextDeficits in dynamic postural control predict lower limb injury. Differing fatiguing protocols negatively affect dynamic postural control. The effect of high-intensity, intermittent exercise on dynamic postural control has not been investigated.

objectiveTo investigate the effect of a high-intensity, intermittent exercise protocol (HIIP) on the dynamic postural control of men and women as measured by the Star Excursion Balance Test (SEBT).

designDescriptive laboratory study.

settingUniversity gymnasium. PATIENTS OR OTHER

participantsTwenty male (age = 20.83 ± 1.50 years, height = 179.24 ± 7.94 cm, mass = 77.67 ± 10.82 kg) and 20 female (age = 20.45 ± 1.34 years, height = 166.08 ± 5.83 cm, mass = 63.02 ± 6.67 kg) athletes. INTERVENTION(S): We recorded SEBT measurements at baseline, pre-HIIP, and post-HIIP. The HIIP consisted of 4 repetitions of 10-m forward sprinting with a 90° change of direction and then backward sprinting for 5 m, 2 repetitions of 2-legged jumping over 5 hurdles, 2 repetitions of high-knee side stepping over 5 hurdles, and 4 repetitions of lateral 5-m shuffles. Participants rested for 30 seconds before repeating the circuit until they reported a score of 18 on the Borg rating of perceived exertion scale. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): A mixed between- and within-subjects analysis of variance was conducted to assess time (pre-HIIP, post-HIIP) × sex interaction effects. Subsequent investigations assessed the main effect of time and sex on normalized maximal SEBT scores. We used intraclass correlation coefficients to determine the test-retest reliability of the SEBT and paired-samples t tests to assess the HIIP effect on circuit times.

resultsWe found a time × sex effect (F(8,69) = 3.5; P range, <.001-.04; η(2) range, 0.057-0.219), with women less negatively affected. We also noted a main effect for time, with worse normalized maximal SEBT scores postfatigue (F(8,69) = 22.39; P < .001; η(2) range, 0.324-0.695), and for sex, as women scored better in 7 SEBT directions (F(8,69) = 0.84; P range, <.001-008; η(2) range, 0.088-0.381). The intraclass correlation coefficients demonstrated high (0.77-0.99) test-retest repeatability. Paired-samples t tests demonstrated increases in circuit time post-HIIP (P < .001).

conclusionsThe HIIP-induced fatigue negatively affected normalized maximal SEBT scores. Women had better scores than men and were affected less negatively by HIIP-induced fatigue.

Indexed as

AthletesBiomechanical PhenomenaExerciseExercise TestFemaleHumansLeg InjuriesMaleMuscle FatiguePerceptionPhysical ExertionPostural BalanceReproducibility of ResultsRunningSensation DisordersSex CharacteristicsbalancesexStar Excursion Balance Test

Identifiers

PMID25689420
PMCPMC4497365

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.