ArticleStatistics in medicine2015
Assessing potentially time-dependent treatment effect from clinical trials and observational studies for survival data, with applications to the Women's Health Initiative combined hormone therapy trial.
Article in Statistics in medicine, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Examining evidence of time-dependent treatment effects: an illustration using regression methods.Trials · 2022Article
- Impact of a non-constant baseline hazard on detection of time-dependent treatment effects: a simulation study.BMC medical research methodology · 2021Article
- A new modeling and inference approach for the Systolic Blood Pressure Intervention Trial outcomes.Clinical trials (London, England) · 2018Article
- How to control for unmeasured confounding in an observational time-to-event study with exposure incidence information: the treatment choice Cox model.Statistics in medicine · 2017Article
- Prostate cancer survival estimates: An application with piecewise hazard function derivation.South Asian journal of cancerArticle
- Sample Size Reestimation in Stochastic Curtailment Tests With Time-to-Events Outcome in the Case of Nonproportional Hazards Utilizing Two Weibull Distributions With Unknown Shape Parameters.Pharmaceutical statisticsArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
For risk and benefit assessment in clinical trials and observational studies with time-to-event data, the Cox model has usually been the model of choice. When the hazards are possibly non-proportional, a piece-wise Cox model over a partition of the time axis may be considered. Here, we propose to analyze clinical trials or observational studies with time-to-event data using a certain semiparametric model. The model allows for a time-dependent treatment effect. It includes the important proportional hazards model as a sub-model and can accommodate various patterns of time-dependence of the hazard ratio. After estimation of the model parameters using a pseudo-likelihood approach, simultaneous confidence intervals for the hazard ratio function are established using a Monte Carlo method to assess the time-varying pattern of the treatment effect. To assess the overall treatment effect, estimated average hazard ratio and its confidence intervals are also obtained. The proposed methods are applied to data from the Women's Health Initiative. To compare the Women's Health Initiative clinical trial and observational study, we use the propensity score in building the regression model. Compared with the piece-wise Cox model, the proposed model yields a better model fit and does not require partitioning of the time axis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.