Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25689273›Full record

ArticlePLoS genetics2015

Genomic selection and association mapping in rice (Oryza sativa): effect of trait genetic architecture, training population composition, marker number and statistical model on accuracy of rice genomic selection in elite, tropical rice breeding lines.

Jennifer Spindel, Hasina Begum, Deniz Akdemir, Parminder Virk, Bertrand Collard, Edilberto Redoña, Gary Atlin, Jean-Luc Jannink, Susan R McCouch

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS genetics, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 287 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
287citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

287 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Targeted expansion of a barley genebank core collection facilitates the discovery of disease resistance loci.TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik · 2026
    Article
  20. Article

227 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Jennifer SpindelDepartment of Plant Breeding and Genetics, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York, United States of America.
Hasina BegumInternational Rice Research Institute, Los Baños, Philippines.
Deniz AkdemirDepartment of Plant Breeding and Genetics, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York, United States of America.
Parminder VirkInternational Center for Tropical Agriculture, Cali, Colombia.
Bertrand CollardInternational Rice Research Institute, Los Baños, Philippines.
Edilberto RedoñaInternational Rice Research Institute, Los Baños, Philippines.
Gary AtlinBill & Melinda Gates Foundation, Seattle, Washington, United States of America.
Jean-Luc JanninkDepartment of Plant Breeding and Genetics, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York, United States of America; US Department of Agriculture-Agricultural Research Service (USDA-ARS), Ithaca, New York, United States of America.
Susan R McCouchDepartment of Plant Breeding and Genetics, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York, United States of America.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Genomic Selection (GS) is a new breeding method in which genome-wide markers are used to predict the breeding value of individuals in a breeding population. GS has been shown to improve breeding efficiency in dairy cattle and several crop plant species, and here we evaluate for the first time its efficacy for breeding inbred lines of rice. We performed a genome-wide association study (GWAS) in conjunction with five-fold GS cross-validation on a population of 363 elite breeding lines from the International Rice Research Institute's (IRRI) irrigated rice breeding program and herein report the GS results. The population was genotyped with 73,147 markers using genotyping-by-sequencing. The training population, statistical method used to build the GS model, number of markers, and trait were varied to determine their effect on prediction accuracy. For all three traits, genomic prediction models outperformed prediction based on pedigree records alone. Prediction accuracies ranged from 0.31 and 0.34 for grain yield and plant height to 0.63 for flowering time. Analyses using subsets of the full marker set suggest that using one marker every 0.2 cM is sufficient for genomic selection in this collection of rice breeding materials. RR-BLUP was the best performing statistical method for grain yield where no large effect QTL were detected by GWAS, while for flowering time, where a single very large effect QTL was detected, the non-GS multiple linear regression method outperformed GS models. For plant height, in which four mid-sized QTL were identified by GWAS, random forest produced the most consistently accurate GS models. Our results suggest that GS, informed by GWAS interpretations of genetic architecture and population structure, could become an effective tool for increasing the efficiency of rice breeding as the costs of genotyping continue to decline.

Indexed as

Genome-Wide Association StudySelection, GeneticAnimal HusbandryAnimalsBreedingCattleChromosome MappingGenetic MarkersGenome, PlantOryzaPhenotypeQuantitative Trait LociGenetic Markers

Identifiers

PMID25689273
PMCPMC4334555

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC0
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.