Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25689208›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of public health2015

Laying the groundwork for evidence-based public health: why some local health departments use more evidence-based decision-making practices than others.

Kay A Lovelace, Robert E Aronson, Kelly L Rulison, Jeffrey D Labban, Gulzar H Shah, Mark Smith

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of public health, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Kay A LovelaceKay A. Lovelace and Kelly L. Rulison are with the Department of Public Health Education, The University of North Carolina at Greensboro. At the time of the study, Robert E. Aronson was with The University of North Carolina at Greensboro. Jeffrey D. Labban is with the Office of Research, School of Health and Human Sciences, The University of North Carolina at Greensboro, Greensboro. Gulzar H. Shah is with the Jiann-Ping Hsu College of Public Health, Georgia Southern University, Statesboro. Mark Smith is with the Health Surveillance and Analysis Unit, Guilford County Department of Public Health, Greensboro.
Robert E Aronson
Kelly L Rulison
Jeffrey D Labban
Gulzar H Shah
Mark Smith

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We examined variation in the use of evidence-based decision-making (EBDM) practices across local health departments (LHDs) in the United States and the extent to which this variation was predicted by resources, personnel, and governance. We analyzed data from the National Association of County and City Health Officials Profile of Local Health Departments, the Association of State and Territorial Health Officials State Health Departments Profile, and the US Census using 2-level multilevel regression models. We found more workforce predictors than resource predictors. Thus, although resources are related to LHDs' use of EBDM practices, the way resources are used (e.g., the types and qualifications of personnel hired) may be more important.

Indexed as

Evidence-Based PracticeLocal GovernmentPublic Health AdministrationCooperative BehaviorDecision MakingHumansPublic Health PracticeResidence CharacteristicsSocioeconomic FactorsSystems AnalysisUnited States

Identifiers

PMID25689208
PMCPMC4355689

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.