Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25688985›Full record

ArticlePloS one2015

New insights into the methodology of L-arginine-induced acute pancreatitis.

Balázs Kui, Zsolt Balla, Béla Vasas, Eszter T Végh, Petra Pallagi, Eszter S Kormányos, Viktória Venglovecz, Béla Iványi, Tamás Takács, Péter Hegyi and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 37 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
37citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

37 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 69 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Nanocarriers for therapeutic phytochemicals.Nanomedicine (London, England) · 2024
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. L-arginine-induced pancreatitis aggravated by inhibiting NaThe Journal of veterinary medical science · 2023
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Balázs KuiFirst Department of Medicine, University of Szeged, Szeged, Hungary.
Zsolt BallaFirst Department of Medicine, University of Szeged, Szeged, Hungary.
Béla VasasDepartment of Pathology, University of Szeged, Szeged, Hungary.
Eszter T VéghFirst Department of Medicine, University of Szeged, Szeged, Hungary.
Petra PallagiFirst Department of Medicine, University of Szeged, Szeged, Hungary.
Eszter S KormányosFirst Department of Medicine, University of Szeged, Szeged, Hungary.
Viktória VengloveczDepartment of Pharmacology and Pharmacotherapy, University of Szeged, Szeged, Hungary.
Béla IványiDepartment of Pathology, University of Szeged, Szeged, Hungary.
Tamás TakácsFirst Department of Medicine, University of Szeged, Szeged, Hungary.
Péter HegyiFirst Department of Medicine, University of Szeged, Szeged, Hungary; Hungarian Academy of Sciences-University of Szeged, Translational Gastroenterology Research Group, Szeged, Hungary.
Zoltán RakonczayFirst Department of Medicine, University of Szeged, Szeged, Hungary.
University of Szeged · HUHungarian Academy of Sciences · HU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Animal models are ideal to study the pathomechanism and therapy of acute pancreatitis (AP). The use of L-arginine-induced AP model is nowadays becoming increasingly popular in mice. However, carefully looking through the literature, marked differences in disease severity could be observed. In fact, while setting up the L-arginine (2×4 g/kg i.p.)-induced AP model in BALB/c mice, we found a relatively low rate (around 15%) of pancreatic necrosis, whereas others have detected much higher rates (up to 55%). We suspected that this may be due to differences between mouse strains. We administered various concentrations (5-30%, pH = 7.4) and doses (2×4, 3×3, or 4×2.5 g/kg) of L-arginine-HCl in BALB/c, FVB/n and C57BL/6 mice. The potential gender-specific effect of L-arginine was investigated in C57BL/6 mice. The fate of mice in response to the i.p. injections of L arginine followed one of three courses. Some mice (1) developed severe AP or (2) remained AP-free by 72 h, whereas others (3) had to be euthanized (to avoid their death, which was caused by the high dose of L-arginine and not AP) within 12 h., In FVB/n and C57BL/6 mice, the pancreatic necrosis rate (about 50%) was significantly higher than that observed in BALB/c mice using 2×4 g/kg 10% L-arginine, but euthanasia was necessary in a large proportion of animals, The i.p. injection of lower L-arginine concentrations (e.g. 5-8%) in case of the 2×4 g/kg dose, or other L-arginine doses (3×3 or 4×2.5 g/kg, 10%) were better for inducing AP. We could not detect any significant differences between the AP severity of male and female mice. Taken together, when setting up the L-arginine-induced AP model, there are several important factors that are worth consideration such as the dose and concentration of the administered L arginine-HCl solution and also the strain of mice.

Indexed as

ArginineDisease Models, AnimalAmylasesAnimalsFemaleMaleMiceMice, Inbred BALB CMice, Inbred C57BLPancreasPancreatitis, Acute NecrotizingPeroxidaseAmylasesArgininePeroxidase

Identifiers

PMID25688985
PMCPMC4331527
OpenAlexW1992289635

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.