Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25688741›Full record

ArticleBritish journal of cancer2015

Checkpoint kinase1 (CHK1) is an important biomarker in breast cancer having a role in chemotherapy response.

M M Al-Kaabi, A T Alshareeda, D A Jerjees, A A Muftah, A R Green, N H Alsubhi, C C Nolan, S Chan, E Cornford, S Madhusudan and 2 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in British journal of cancer, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 45 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

M M Al-Kaabi1] Breast Cancer Pathology Research Group, Division of Cancer and Stem Cells, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, City Hospital, Nottingham NG5 1PB, UK [2] Department of Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, Al-Mustansiriya University, Baghdad, Iraq.
A T Alshareeda1] Breast Cancer Pathology Research Group, Division of Cancer and Stem Cells, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, City Hospital, Nottingham NG5 1PB, UK [2] Ministry of Higher Education, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
D A JerjeesBreast Cancer Pathology Research Group, Division of Cancer and Stem Cells, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, City Hospital, Nottingham NG5 1PB, UK.
A A MuftahBreast Cancer Pathology Research Group, Division of Cancer and Stem Cells, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, City Hospital, Nottingham NG5 1PB, UK.
A R GreenBreast Cancer Pathology Research Group, Division of Cancer and Stem Cells, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, City Hospital, Nottingham NG5 1PB, UK.
N H AlsubhiBreast Cancer Pathology Research Group, Division of Cancer and Stem Cells, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, City Hospital, Nottingham NG5 1PB, UK.
C C NolanBreast Cancer Pathology Research Group, Division of Cancer and Stem Cells, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, City Hospital, Nottingham NG5 1PB, UK.
S ChanDepartment of Oncology, Division of Cancer and Stem Cells, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham and Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, City Hospital, Nottingham NG5 1PB, UK.
E CornfordDepartment of Radiology, Breast Institute, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, City Hospital, Nottingham NG5 1PB, UK.
S MadhusudanDepartment of Oncology, Division of Cancer and Stem Cells, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham and Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, City Hospital, Nottingham NG5 1PB, UK.
I O Ellis1] Breast Cancer Pathology Research Group, Division of Cancer and Stem Cells, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, City Hospital, Nottingham NG5 1PB, UK [2] Department of Cellular Pathology, The University of Nottingham and Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, Nottingham NG5 1PB, UK.
E A Rakha1] Breast Cancer Pathology Research Group, Division of Cancer and Stem Cells, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, City Hospital, Nottingham NG5 1PB, UK [2] Department of Cellular Pathology, The University of Nottingham and Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, Nottingham NG5 1PB, UK.
Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust · GBUniversity of Nottingham · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCheckpoint kinase1 (CHK1), which is a key component of DNA-damage-activated checkpoint signalling response, may have a role in breast cancer (BC) pathogenesis and influence response to chemotherapy. This study investigated the clinicopathological significance of phosphorylated CHK1 (pCHK1) protein in BC.

methodpCHK1 protein expression was assessed using immunohistochemistry in a large, well-characterized annotated series of early-stage primary operable invasive BC prepared as tissue microarray (n=1200).

resultpCHK1 showed nuclear and/or cytoplasmic expression. Tumours with nuclear expression showed positive associations with favourable prognostic features such as lower grade, lower mitotic activity, expression of hormone receptor and lack of expression of KI67 and PI3K (P<0.001). On the other hand, cytoplasmic expression was associated with features of poor prognosis such as higher grade, triple-negative phenotype and expression of KI67, p53, AKT and PI3K. pCHK1 expression showed an association with DNA damage response (ATM, RAD51, BRCA1, KU70/KU80, DNA-PKCα and BARD1) and sumoylation (UBC9 and PIASγ) biomarkers. Subcellular localisation of pCHK1 was associated with the expression of the nuclear transport protein KPNA2. Positive nuclear expression predicted better survival outcome in patients who did not receive chemotherapy in the whole series and in ER-positive tumours. In ER-negative and triple-negative subgroups, nuclear pCHK1 predicted shorter survival in patients who received cyclophosphamide, methotrexate and 5-florouracil chemotherapy.

conclusionsOur data suggest that pCHK1 may have prognostic and predictive significance in BC. Subcellular localisation of pCHK1 protein is related to its function.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedalpha KaryopherinsBiomarkers, TumorBreast NeoplasmsCell NucleusCheckpoint Kinase 1CytoplasmFemaleGene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticHumansMiddle AgedPhosphorylationProtein KinasesSignal Transductionalpha KaryopherinsBiomarkers, TumorCheckpoint Kinase 1CHEK1 protein, humanKPNA2 protein, humanProtein Kinases

Identifiers

PMID25688741
PMCPMC4453942
OpenAlexW2024694023

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.