Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25688377›Full record

ReviewTheScientificWorldJournal2015

Heavy metal stress and some mechanisms of plant defense response.

Abolghassem Emamverdian, Yulong Ding, Farzad Mokhberdoran, Yinfeng Xie

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in TheScientificWorldJournal, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 181 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
181citing papers in PubMed
27.6field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

181 citing papers in PubMed, 1,060 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Effects ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2026
    Article
  16. Identification of metal-tolerant herbaceous species for phytostabilization and ecological restoration of fly ash dumpsites.Physiology and molecular biology of plants : an international journal of functional plant biology · 2025
    Article
  17. Comparative Physiological Responses ofPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article

121 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Abolghassem EmamverdianCenter of Modern Forestry in Southern China, Nanjing Forestry University, Nanjing 210037, China ; College of Biology and the Environment, Nanjing Forestry University, Nanjing 210037, China.
Yulong DingCenter of Modern Forestry in Southern China, Nanjing Forestry University, Nanjing 210037, China ; Bamboo Research Institute, Nanjing Forestry University, Nanjing 210037, China.
Farzad MokhberdoranDepartment of Agronomy and Plant Breeding, Faculty of Agriculture, Islamic Azad University, Mashhad Branch, Mashhad 9187147578, Iran.
Yinfeng XieCenter of Modern Forestry in Southern China, Nanjing Forestry University, Nanjing 210037, China ; College of Biology and the Environment, Nanjing Forestry University, Nanjing 210037, China.
Nanjing Forestry University · CNIslamic Azad University, Mashhad · IR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Unprecedented bioaccumulation and biomagnification of heavy metals (HMs) in the environment have become a dilemma for all living organisms including plants. HMs at toxic levels have the capability to interact with several vital cellular biomolecules such as nuclear proteins and DNA, leading to excessive augmentation of reactive oxygen species (ROS). This would inflict serious morphological, metabolic, and physiological anomalies in plants ranging from chlorosis of shoot to lipid peroxidation and protein degradation. In response, plants are equipped with a repertoire of mechanisms to counteract heavy metal (HM) toxicity. The key elements of these are chelating metals by forming phytochelatins (PCs) or metallothioneins (MTs) metal complex at the intra- and intercellular level, which is followed by the removal of HM ions from sensitive sites or vacuolar sequestration of ligand-metal complex. Nonenzymatically synthesized compounds such as proline (Pro) are able to strengthen metal-detoxification capacity of intracellular antioxidant enzymes. Another important additive component of plant defense system is symbiotic association with arbuscular mycorrhizal (AM) fungi. AM can effectively immobilize HMs and reduce their uptake by host plants via binding metal ions to hyphal cell wall and excreting several extracellular biomolecules. Additionally, AM fungi can enhance activities of antioxidant defense machinery of plants.

Indexed as

Chelating AgentsEnvironmental PollutantsInactivation, MetabolicMetallothioneinMetals, HeavyMycorrhizaePlantsReactive Oxygen SpeciesStress, PhysiologicalChelating AgentsEnvironmental PollutantsMetallothioneinMetals, HeavyReactive Oxygen Species

Identifiers

PMID25688377
PMCPMC4321847
OpenAlexW2019710932

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.