Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25688291›Full record

ArticleBiotechnology for biofuels2015

Impact of two ionic liquids, 1-ethyl-3-methylimidazolium acetate and 1-ethyl-3-methylimidazolium methylphosphonate, on Saccharomyces cerevisiae: metabolic, physiologic, and morphological investigations.

Nasir Mehmood, Eric Husson, Cédric Jacquard, Sandra Wewetzer, Jochen Büchs, Catherine Sarazin, Isabelle Gosselin

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biotechnology for biofuels, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
5.4field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 60 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Frontiers in molecular biosciences · 2023
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Production of tetra-methylpyrazine using engineeredMetabolic engineering communications · 2020
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Nasir MehmoodUnité Génie Enzymatique et Cellulaire, FRE-CNRS 3580, Université de Picardie Jules Verne, 33 rue Saint-Leu, 80039 Amiens Cedex, France.
Eric HussonUnité Génie Enzymatique et Cellulaire, FRE-CNRS 3580, Université de Picardie Jules Verne, 33 rue Saint-Leu, 80039 Amiens Cedex, France.
Cédric JacquardUnité de Recherche Vignes et Vins de Champagne-UPRES-EA 4707, Université de Reims Champagne-Ardenne, BP1039, 51687 Reims Cedex 2, France.
Sandra WewetzerAVT-Biochemical Engineering, RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Germany.
Jochen BüchsAVT-Biochemical Engineering, RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Germany.
Catherine SarazinUnité Génie Enzymatique et Cellulaire, FRE-CNRS 3580, Université de Picardie Jules Verne, 33 rue Saint-Leu, 80039 Amiens Cedex, France.
Isabelle GosselinUnité Génie Enzymatique et Cellulaire, FRE-CNRS 3580, Université de Picardie Jules Verne, 33 rue Saint-Leu, 80039 Amiens Cedex, France.
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique · FRRWTH Aachen University · DEUniversité de Picardie Jules Verne · FRUniversité de Reims Champagne-Ardenne · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIonic liquids (ILs) are considered as suitable candidates for lignocellulosic biomass pretreatment prior enzymatic saccharification and, obviously, for second-generation bioethanol production. However, several reports showed toxic or inhibitory effects of residual ILs on microorganisms, plants, and animal cells which could affect a subsequent enzymatic saccharification and fermentation process.

resultsIn this context, the impact of two hydrophilic imidazolium-based ILs already used in lignocellulosic biomass pretreatment was investigated: 1-ethyl-3-methylimidazolium acetate [Emim][OAc] and 1-ethyl-3-methylimidazolium methylphosphonate [Emim][MeO(H)PO2]. Their effects were assessed on the model yeast for ethanolic fermentation, Saccharomyces cerevisiae, grown in a culture medium containing glucose as carbon source and various IL concentrations. Classical fermentation parameters were followed: growth, glucose consumption and ethanol production, and two original factors: the respiratory status with the oxygen transfer rate (OTR) and carbon dioxide transfer rate (CTR) of yeasts which were monitored online by respiratory activity monitoring systems (RAMOS). In addition, yeast morphology was characterized by environmental scanning electron microscope (ESEM). The addition of ILs to the growth medium inhibited the OTR and switched the metabolism from respiration (conversion of glucose into biomass) to fermentation (conversion of glucose to ethanol). This behavior could be observed at low IL concentrations (≤5% IL) while above there is no significant growth or ethanol production. The presence of IL in the growth medium also induced changes of yeast morphology, which exhibited wrinkled, softened, and holed shapes. Both ILs showed the same effects, but [Emim][MeO(H)PO2] was more biocompatible than [Emim][OAc] and could be better tolerated by S. cerevisiae.

conclusionsThese two imidazolium-derived ILs were appropriate candidates for useful pretreatment of lignocellulosic biomass in the context of second-generation bioethanol production. This fundamental study provides additional information about the toxic effects of ILs. Indeed, the investigations highlighted the better tolerance by S. cerevisiae of [Emim][MeO(H)PO2] than [Emim][OAc].

Indexed as

Environmental scanning electronic microscopyIonic liquidRespirofermentative metabolismSaccharomyces cerevisiaeSecond-generation bioethanol

Identifiers

PMID25688291
PMCPMC4329657
OpenAlexW2132878752

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.