ArticleBiotechnology for biofuels2015
Comparative metagenomics of biogas-producing microbial communities from production-scale biogas plants operating under wet or dry fermentation conditions.
Article in Biotechnology for biofuels, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 45 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
45 citing papers in PubMed, 182 citations in OpenAlex.
- Review
- P-hydroxybenzoic acid positively affect theJournal of ginseng research · 2024Article
- A metagenomic approach to demystify the anaerobic digestion black box and achieve higher biogas yield: a review.Frontiers in microbiology · 2024Review
- Archaeal and Bacterial Content in a Two-Stage Anaerobic System for Efficient Energy Production from Agricultural Wastes.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Phage Genome Diversity in a Biogas-Producing Microbiome Analyzed by Illumina and Nanopore GridION Sequencing.Microorganisms · 2022Article
- Overview on agricultural potentials of biogas slurry (BGS): applications, challenges, and solutions.Biomass conversion and biorefinery · 2022Review
- Archaeal community dynamics in biogas fermentation at various temperatures assessed by mcrA amplicon sequencing using different primer pairs.World journal of microbiology & biotechnology · 2021Article
- Management of microbial enzymes for biofuels and biogas production by using metagenomic and genome editing approaches.3 Biotech · 2021Review
- Characterization of Blf4, an Archaeal Lytic Virus Targeting a Member of the Methanomicrobiales.Viruses · 2021Article
- Metagenomic Insight into Lignocellulose Degradation of the Thermophilic Microbial Consortium TMC7.Journal of microbiology and biotechnology · 2021Article
- Comparison of microbial community structures between mesophilic and thermophilic anaerobic digestion of vegetable waste.Bioprocess and biosystems engineering · 2021Article
- Metagenomics survey unravels diversity of biogas microbiomes with potential to enhance productivity in Kenya.PloS one · 2021Article
- A Modular Metagenomics Pipeline Allowing for the Inclusion of Prior Knowledge Using the Example of Anaerobic Digestion.Microorganisms · 2020Article
- Biogas-producing microbial composition of an anaerobic digester and associated bovine residues.MicrobiologyOpen · 2019Article
- Long-term investigation of microbial community composition and transcription patterns in a biogas plant undergoing ammonia crisis.Microbial biotechnology · 2019Article
- Immediate Effects of Ammonia Shock on Transcription and Composition of a Biogas Reactor Microbiome.Frontiers in microbiology · 2019Article
- Comparative analysis of deep sequenced methanogenic communities: identification of microorganisms responsible for methane production.Microbial cell factories · 2018Article
- Metabolic Interactions of a Chain Elongation Microbiome.Applied and environmental microbiology · 2018Article
- Targeted in situ metatranscriptomics for selected taxa from mesophilic and thermophilic biogas plants.Microbial biotechnology · 2018Article
- Detection of novel syntrophic acetate-oxidizing bacteria from biogas processes by continuous acetate enrichment approaches.Microbial biotechnology · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundDecomposition of biomass for biogas production can be practiced under wet and dry fermentation conditions. In contrast to the dry fermentation technology, wet fermentation is characterized by a high liquid content and a relatively low total solid content. In this study, the composition and functional potential of a biogas-producing microbial community in an agricultural biogas reactor operating under wet fermentation conditions was analyzed by a metagenomic approach applying 454-pyrosequencing. The obtained metagenomic dataset and corresponding 16S rRNA gene amplicon sequences were compared to the previously sequenced comparable metagenome from a dry fermentation process, meeting explicitly identical boundary conditions regarding sample and community DNA preparation, sequencing technology, processing of sequence reads and data analyses by bioinformatics tools.
resultsHigh-throughput metagenome sequencing of community DNA from the wet fermentation process applying the pyrosequencing approach resulted in 1,532,780 reads, with an average read length of 397 bp, accounting for approximately 594 million bases of sequence information in total. Taxonomic comparison of the communities from wet and dry fermentation revealed similar microbial profiles with Bacteria being the predominant superkingdom, while the superkingdom Archaea was less abundant. In both biogas plants, the bacterial phyla Firmicutes, Bacteroidetes, Spirochaetes and Proteobacteria were identified with descending frequencies. Within the archaeal superkingdom, the phylum Euryarchaeota was most abundant with the dominant class Methanomicrobia. Functional profiles of the communities revealed that environmental gene tags representing methanogenesis enzymes were present in both biogas plants in comparable frequencies. 16S rRNA gene amplicon high-throughput sequencing disclosed differences in the sub-communities comprising methanogenic Archaea between both processes. Fragment recruitments of metagenomic reads to the reference genome of the archaeon Methanoculleus bourgensis MS2(T) revealed that dominant methanogens within the dry fermentation process were highly related to the reference.
conclusionsAlthough process parameters, substrates and technology differ between the wet and dry biogas fermentations analyzed in this study, community profiles are very similar at least at higher taxonomic ranks, illustrating that core community taxa perform key functions in biomass decomposition and methane synthesis. Regarding methanogenesis, Archaea highly related to the type strain M. bourgensis MS2(T) dominate the dry fermentation process, suggesting the adaptation of members belonging to this species to specific fermentation process parameters.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.