Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25688287›Full record

ArticleJournal of physics. A, Mathematical and theoretical2015

Theoretical Analysis of Dynamic Processes for Interacting Molecular Motors.

Hamid Teimouri, Anatoly B Kolomeisky, Kareem Mehrabiani

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of physics. A, Mathematical and theoretical, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
14.1field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 60 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Fluctuating landscapes and heavy tails in animal behavior.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2023
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Hamid TeimouriDepartment of Chemistry and Center for Theoretical Biological Physics, Rice University, Houston, Texas, 77005, USA.
Anatoly B KolomeiskyDepartment of Chemistry and Center for Theoretical Biological Physics, Rice University, Houston, Texas, 77005, USA.
Kareem MehrabianiDepartment of Chemistry and Center for Theoretical Biological Physics, Rice University, Houston, Texas, 77005, USA.
Center for Theoretical Biological Physics · US

Funding

Molecular Mechanisms Governing Cooperating MotorsR01GM094489 · NIGMS · RICE UNIVERSITY · PI DIEHL, MICHAEL R · 2010 to 2014
$1.4M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM094489
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Biological transport is supported by collective dynamics of enzymatic molecules that are called motor proteins or molecular motors. Experiments suggest that motor proteins interact locally via short-range potentials. We investigate the fundamental role of these interactions by analyzing a new class of totally asymmetric exclusion processes where interactions are accounted for in a thermodynamically consistent fashion. It allows us to connect explicitly microscopic features of motor proteins with their collective dynamic properties. Theoretical analysis that combines various mean-field calculations and computer simulations suggests that dynamic properties of molecular motors strongly depend on interactions, and correlations are stronger for interacting motor proteins. Surprisingly, it is found that there is an optimal strength of interactions (weak repulsion) that leads to a maximal particle flux. It is also argued that molecular motors transport is more sensitive to attractive interactions. Applications of these results for kinesin motor proteins are discussed.

Identifiers

PMID25688287
PMCPMC4326232
OpenAlexW2107187480

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.