ArticleGastroenterology report2015
Histopathological study using computer database of 10 000 consecutive gastric specimens: (1) benign conditions.
Article in Gastroenterology report, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.
- Identification of molecular biomarkers for the diagnosis of gastric cancer and lymph-node metastasis.Gastroenterology report · 2019Article
- Article
- A novel summary report of colonoscopy: timeline visualization providing meaningful colonoscopy video information.International journal of colorectal disease · 2018Article
- Signet-ring cell carcinoma of the stomach: Impact on prognosis and specific therapeutic challenge.World journal of gastroenterology · 2015Review
- Primary Gastric Lymphoma, Epidemiology, Clinical Diagnosis, and Treatment.Cancer control : journal of the Moffitt Cancer CenterArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Using a computer database, the author investigated the histopathology of 10 000 consecutive gastric specimens, taken in the last 12 years (2002-2013) at the pathology laboratory of a Japanese hospital. Re-observation of the already examined histological sections was done when the histological diagnosis and findings on the computer data base were not very obvious. The gastric specimens were identified as 8579 benign conditions and 1421 malignant lesions. The 8579 benign conditions were comprised almost normal stomach in 74 cases (0.9%), chronic gastritis in 4374 (51.0%), benign gastric peptic ulcer in 2195 (25.6%), foveolar hyperplastic polyp in 1004 (11.7%), fundic gland polyp in 421 (4.9%), adenoma in 487 (5.6%), heterotopic pancreas in 9 (0.1%), pancreatic acinar metaplasia (PAM) in 8 (0.1%), and amyloidosis in 7 (0.1%). Chronic gastritis showed lymphocytic infiltration and frequently showed erosions and intestinal metaplasia. Gastric peptic ulcer showed exudate, necrosis, active inflammation, and regenerative atypia of the epithelium. Foveolar hyperplastic polyp revealed 23 malignant changes and frequently showed dysplastic glands and intestinal metaplasia. Fundic gland polyp demonstrated cystic dilations of fundic gland ducts. Gastric adenoma showed adenomatous proliferation in the superficial mucosa and cystic dilation of the epithelium under the adenoma. Heterotopic pancreas was located in the submucosa and consisted of acinar cells, ducts, and occasionally islets. PAM was a tiny lesion in the mucosa and consisted of only pancreatic acinar cells. Amyloidosis was primary amyloidosis with positive reaction with Congo-red stain.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.