ArticleBMJ open2015
A survey-based cross-sectional study of doctors' expectations and experiences of non-technical skills for Out of Hours work.
Article in BMJ open, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.
- Prepared on Paper, Unprepared in Practice: The Transition From Medical Student to Resident Doctor.Cureus · 2026Article
- Exploring the experiences of residents in managing multiple roles at tertiary care hospitals of Punjab, Pakistan.Pakistan journal of medical sciences · 2025Article
- Extended reality and computer-based simulation for teaching situational awareness in undergraduate health professions education: a scoping review.Advances in simulation (London, England) · 2025Article
- Ward-based in situ simulation: lessons learnt from a UK District General Hospital.BMJ open quality · 2024Article
- Teaching Undergraduate Medical Students Non-Technical Skills: An Evaluation Study of a Simulated Ward Experience.Advances in medical education and practice · 2022Article
- A foundation interim year 1 sequential simulation experience and analysis of preparedness to practice early.Future healthcare journal · 2021Article
- Reliability of assessment of medical students' non-technical skills using a behavioural marker system: does clinical experience matter?BMJ simulation & technology enhanced learning · 2021Article
- Exploring the experiences and opinions of hospital pharmacists working 24/7 shifts.European journal of hospital pharmacy : science and practice · 2019Article
- Factors affecting -individual task prioritisation in a workplace setting.Future healthcare journal · 2018Review
- Exploring student perceptions of ward simulation as an exercise to improve decision-making skills in the clinical context.MedEdPublish (2016) · 2018Article
- Early acquisition of non-technical skills using a blended approach to simulation-based medical education.Advances in simulation (London, England) · 2017Article
- NightShift simulation to train newly qualified doctors in non-technical skills: a feasibility study.Future hospital journal · 2016Article
- Technology: Use or lose our navigation skills.Nature · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesThe skill set required for junior doctors to work efficiently and safely Out of Hours (OoH) in hospitals has not been established. This is despite the OoH period representing 75% of the year and it being the time of highest mortality. We set out to explore the expectations of medical students and experiences of junior doctors of the non-technical skills needed to work OoH.
designSurvey-based cross-sectional study informed by focus groups.
settingOnline survey with participants from five large teaching hospitals across the UK.
participants300 Medical Students and Doctors OUTCOME MEASURE: Participants ranked the importance of non-technical skills, as identified by literature review and focus groups, needed for OoH care.
resultsThe focus groups revealed a total of eight non-technical skills deemed to be important. In the survey 'Task Prioritisation' (mean rank 1.617) was consistently identified as the most important non-technical skill. Stage of training affected the ranking of skills, with significant differences for 'Communication with Senior Doctors', 'Dealing with Clinical Isolation', 'Task Prioritisation' and 'Communication with Patients'. Importantly, there was a significant discrepancy between the medical student expectations and experiences of doctors undertaking work.
conclusionsOur findings suggest that medical staff particularly value task prioritisation skills; however, these are not routinely taught in medical schools. The discrepancy between expectations of students and experience of doctors reinforces the idea that there is a gap in training. Doctors of different grades place different importance on specific non-technical skills with implications for postgraduate training. There is a pressing need for medical schools and deaneries to review non-technical training to include more than communication skills.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.