Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25687853›Full record

ArticleCancer research and treatment2016

Simultaneous Detection of Disseminated and Circulating Tumor Cells in Primary Breast Cancer Patients.

Andreas D Hartkopf, Markus Wallwiener, Markus Hahn, Tanja N Fehm, Sara Y Brucker, Florin-Andrei Taran

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer research and treatment, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Synchronous Detection of Circulating Tumor Cells in Blood and Disseminated Tumor Cells in Bone Marrow Predicts Adverse Outcome in Early Breast Cancer.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2019
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Andreas D HartkopfDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany.
Markus WallwienerDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
Markus HahnDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany.
Tanja N FehmDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Duesseldorf, Duesseldorf, Germany.
Sara Y BruckerDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany.
Florin-Andrei TaranDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeDisseminated tumor cells (DTCs) from bone marrow (BM) are a surrogate of minimal residual disease (MRD) in primary breast cancer (PBC) patients and associated with an adverse prognosis. However, BM sampling is an invasive procedure. Although there is growing evidence that circulating tumor cells (CTCs) from the blood are also suitable for monitoring MRD, data on the simultaneous detection of DTCs and CTCs are limited. MATERIALS AND

methodsWe determined the presence of DTCs using immunocytochemistry and the pan-cytokeratin antibody A45-B/B3. CTCs were determined simultaneously using a reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction-based assay (AdnaTest Breast Cancer) and CellSearch (at least one CTC per 7.5 mL blood). We compared the detection of DTCs and CTCs and evaluated their impact on disease-free and overall survival.

resultsOf 585 patients, 131 (22%) were positive for DTCs; 19 of 202 (9%) and 18 of 383 (5%) patients were positive for CTCs, as shown by AdnaTest and CellSearch, respectively. No significant association was observed between DTCs and CTCs (p=0.248 and p=0.146 as shown by AdnaTest and CellSearch, respectively). The presence of DTCs (p=0.046) and the presence of CTCs as shown by CellSearch (p=0.007) were predictive of disease-free survival.

conclusionOur data confirm the prognostic relevance of DTCs and CTCs in patients with PBC. As we found no significant relationship between DTCs and CTCs, prospective trials should include their simultaneous detection. Within those trials, the question of whether or not DTCs and CTCs are independent subpopulations of malignant cell clones should be determined by molecular characterization.

Indexed as

Neoplastic Cells, CirculatingBreast NeoplasmsFemaleHumansNeoplasm MetastasisPrognosisProspective StudiesBone marrowBreast neoplasmsCirculating neoplastic cellsPrognosisResidual neoplasm

Identifiers

PMID25687853
PMCPMC4720101

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.