Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25687807›Full record

ReviewCurrent oncology reports2015

Long-term experience with (laterally) extended endopelvic resection (LEER) in relapsed pelvic malignancies.

Michael Höckel

Registry-linked trialAbstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Current oncology reports, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02986568 (Cohort Study for Comparing the Efficacy Between the Standard Treatment and Fusion Ontogenetic Surgery for Gynecologic Cancers), which is not on this map. Cited by 19 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02986568 naunknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2016, after this paper: background citation

Cohort Study for Comparing the Efficacy Between the Standard Treatment and Fusion Ontogenetic Surgery for Gynecologic Cancers (FUSION Trial IV)

TypeinterventionalSponsorSeoul National University HospitalRan2016 to 2025Enrolled380ConditionsCervical Cancer, Uterine CancerArmsCervical cancer, Uterine cancer, Cervical cancer, pelvic sidewall invasion, Non-cervical cancer, pelvic sidewall invasion
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 43 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Chinese Expert Consensus on IodineFrontiers in oncology · 2021
    Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Michael HöckelDepartment of Gynecology, University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany, michael.hoeckel@uniklinik-leipzig.de.
Leipzig University · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Gynecologic cancers recurring in the pelvis are generally advanced in malignant progression limiting curative treatment approaches. The cancer field theory links cancer progression to reversed morphogenesis and allows the exact anatomical delineation of the cancer field, i.e., the tissue compartment of potential tumor infiltration related to the tumor's ontogenetic stage. Cancer surgery is redefined with the resection of ontogenetic stage-related cancer fields instead of the mere removal of the malignant tumor with an uninvolved tissue margin. Most gynecologic pelvic malignancies recurring in the pelvis represent ontogenetic stages 3 and 4. (Laterally) extended endopelvic resection ((L)EER) has been designed to resect the cancer fields of gynecologic tumors in these advanced ontogenetic stages. This paper reports long-term experience with (L)EER for relapsed pelvic malignancies strongly supporting the cancer field theory and the principle and practice of cancer field resection.

Indexed as

FemaleHumansNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalPelvic ExenterationPelvisUrogenital NeoplasmsUterine Cervical Neoplasms

Identifiers

PMID25687807
OpenAlexW2121917229

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.