Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25687653›Full record

ArticleLeukemia2015

Different biological risk factors in young poor-prognosis and elderly patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma.

H Horn, M Ziepert, M Wartenberg, A M Staiger, T F E Barth, H-W Bernd, A C Feller, W Klapper, C Stuhlmann-Laeisz, M Hummel and 14 more

Abstract readComparative Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Leukemia, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed
6.9field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 63 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Advances in Lymphoma Molecular Diagnostics.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

24 authors at 15 institutions in 2 countries.

H HornDepartment of Clinical Pathology, Robert-Bosch-Krankenhaus, and Dr Margarete Fischer-Bosch Institute of Clinical Pharmacology, University of Tuebingen, Stuttgart, Germany.
M ZiepertInstitute for Medical Informatics, Statistics and Epidemiology, Universität Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany.
M WartenbergInstitute of Pathology, Universität Würzburg and Comprehensive Cancer Center Mainfranken (CCCMF), Würzburg, Germany.
A M StaigerDepartment of Clinical Pathology, Robert-Bosch-Krankenhaus, and Dr Margarete Fischer-Bosch Institute of Clinical Pharmacology, University of Tuebingen, Stuttgart, Germany.
T F E BarthInstitute of Pathology, Universitätsklinikum Ulm, Ulm, Germany.
H-W BerndInstitute of Pathology, Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany.
A C FellerInstitute of Pathology, Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany.
W KlapperInstitute of Pathology, Hematopathology Section and Lymph Node Registry, Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel, Kiel, Germany.
C Stuhlmann-LaeiszInstitute of Pathology, Hematopathology Section and Lymph Node Registry, Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel, Kiel, Germany.
M HummelInstitute of Pathology, Campus Benjamin Franklin, Charité Universitätsmedizin, Berlin, Germany.
H SteinPathodiagnostik Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
D LenzeInstitute of Pathology, Campus Benjamin Franklin, Charité Universitätsmedizin, Berlin, Germany.
S HartmannInstitute of Pathology, Universitätsklinikum Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany.
M-L HansmannInstitute of Pathology, Universitätsklinikum Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany.
P MöllerInstitute of Pathology, Universitätsklinikum Ulm, Ulm, Germany.
S CogliattiInstitute of Pathology, Kantonal Hospital St Gallen, St Gallen, Switzerland.
M PfreundschuhMedizinische Klinik I, Saarland University Medical School, Homburg/Saar, Germany.
L TrümperDepartment of Hematology and Oncology, Georg-August Universität, Göttingen, Germany.
M LoefflerInstitute for Medical Informatics, Statistics and Epidemiology, Universität Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany.
B GlassDepartment of Hematology, Asklepios Klinik St Georg, Hamburg, Germany.
N SchmitzDepartment of Hematology, Asklepios Klinik St Georg, Hamburg, Germany.
G OttDepartment of Clinical Pathology, Robert-Bosch-Krankenhaus, Stuttgart, Germany.
A RosenwaldInstitute of Pathology, Universität Würzburg and Comprehensive Cancer Center Mainfranken (CCCMF), Würzburg, Germany.
DSHNHL16
University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein · DEAsklepios Klinik St. Georg · DECharité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin · DEComprehensive Cancer Center Mainfranken · DELeipzig University · DERobert Bosch Hospital · DEUniversity Hospital Ulm · DEDr. Margarete Fischer-Bosch-Institute of Clinical Pharmacology · DEGoethe University Frankfurt · DEKantonsspital St. Gallen · CHPathodiagnostik Berlin · DESaarland University · DEUniversity Hospital Frankfurt · DEUniversity of Göttingen · DEUniversity of Lübeck · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Prognostically relevant risk factors in patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) have predominantly been evaluated in elderly populations. We tested whether previously described risk factors are also valid in younger, poor-prognosis DLBCL patients. Paraffin-embedded samples from 112 patients with de novo DLBCL, enrolled in the R-MegaCHOEP trial of the German High Grade Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma Study Group (DSHNHL) were investigated using immunohistochemistry (MYC, FOXP1, LMO2, GCET1, CD5, CD10, BCL2, BCL6, IRF4/MUM1) and fluorescence in situ hybridization (MYC, BCL2, BCL6). MYC, BCL2 and BCL6 breaks occurred in 14, 21 and 31%, respectively. In the majority of cases, MYC was simultaneously rearranged with BCL2 and/or BCL6. The adverse impact of MYC rearrangements was confirmed, but the sole presence of BCL2 breaks emerged as a novel prognostic marker associated with inferior overall survival (OS) (P=0.002). Combined overexpression of MYC and BCL2 showed only limited association with inferior OS. All immunohistochemical cell of origin classifiers applied failed to predict survival time. DLBCL tumors with significant proportion of immunoblastic and/or immunoblastic-plasmacytoid cells had inferior OS, independently from from BCL2 break. Younger, poor-prognosis DLBCL patients, therefore, display different biological risk factors compared with an elderly population, with BCL2 translocations emerging as a powerful negative prognostic marker.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultBiomarkers, TumorFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansImmunoenzyme TechniquesIn Situ Hybridization, FluorescenceLymphoma, Large B-Cell, DiffuseMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm StagingPrognosisProspective StudiesProto-Oncogene Proteins c-bcl-2Proto-Oncogene Proteins c-mycBiomarkers, TumorProto-Oncogene Proteins c-bcl-2Proto-Oncogene Proteins c-myc

Identifiers

PMID25687653
OpenAlexW2087903667

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.