Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25687633›Full record

ArticleJournal of neuroscience methods2015

Array tomography for the detection of non-dilated, injured axons in traumatic brain injury.

Rachel E Bennett, David L Brody

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neuroscience methods, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Correcting miR92a-vGAT-Mediated GABAergic Dysfunctions Rescues Human Tau-Induced Anxiety in Mice.Molecular therapy : the journal of the American Society of Gene Therapy · 2017
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Rachel E BennettDepartment of Neurology, Washington University in St. Louis, 660 S. Euclid Avenue, Saint Louis, MO 63110, USA.
David L BrodyDepartment of Neurology, Washington University in St. Louis, 660 S. Euclid Avenue, Saint Louis, MO 63110, USA. Electronic address: brodyd@neuro.wustl.edu.

Funding

Mechanisms Underlying Tauopathy Following Traumatic Brain InjuryR01NS065069 · NINDS · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI BRODY, DAVID L · 2009 to 2017
$3.3M
Contribution of Microglia to Axonal Injury following Repetitive Concussion in MouF31NS076047 · NINDS · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI BENNETT, RACHEL ELISE · 2012 to 2013
$54k
NINDS NIH HHS F31 NS076047NINDS NIH HHS F31-NS076047NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS065069NINDS NIH HHS R01-NS065069
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAxonal injury is a key feature of several types of brain trauma and neurological disease. However, in mice and humans, many axons are less than 500 nm in diameter which is at or below the resolution of most conventional light microscopic imaging methods. In moderate to severe forms of axon injury, damaged axons become dilated and therefore readily detectible by light microscopy. However, in more subtle forms of injury, the damaged axons may remain undilated and therefore difficult to detect. NEW

methodHere we present a method for adapting array tomography for the identification and quantification of injured axons. In this technique, ultrathin (∼70 nm) plastic sections of tissue are prepared, labeled with axon injury-relevant antibodies and imaged using conventional epifluorescence.

resultsTo demonstrate the use of array-tomography-based methods, we determined that mice that received two closed-skull concussive traumatic brain injury impacts had significantly increased numbers of non-dilated axons that were immunoreactive for non-phosphorylated neurofilament (SMI-32; a marker of axonal injury), compared to sham mice (1682±628 versus 339±52 per mm(2), p=0.004, one-tailed Mann-Whitney U test). Tubulin loss was not evident (p=0.2063, one-tailed Mann-Whitney U test). Furthermore, mice that were subjected to more severe injury had a loss of tubulin in addition to both dilated and non-dilated SMI-32 immunoreactive axons indicating that this technique is suitable for the analysis of various injury conditions. COMPARISON WITH EXISTING

methodWith array tomography we could detect similar overall numbers of axons as electron microscopy, but accurate diameter measurements were limited to those with diameters >200 nm. Importantly, array tomography had greater sensitivity for detecting small non-dilated injured axons compared with conventional immunohistochemistry.

conclusionImaging of individual axons and quantification of subtle axonal injury is possible using this array tomography method. This method may be most useful for the assessment of concussive injuries and other pathologies in which injured axons are not typically dilated. The ability to process moderately large volumes of tissue, label multiple proteins of interest, and automate analysis support array tomography as a useful alternative to electron microscopy.

Indexed as

AxonsAmyloid beta-Protein PrecursorAnimalsBrainBrain InjuriesFreeze FracturingMaleMiceMice, Inbred C57BLMice, KnockoutMice, TransgenicMicroscopy, ElectronMutationNerve Tissue Proteinstau ProteinsTubulinAmyloid beta-Protein PrecursorNerve Tissue Proteinstau ProteinsTubulinArray tomographyAxonal injuryElectron microscopyNeurofilamentTraumatic brain injuryTubulin

Identifiers

PMID25687633
PMCPMC4393800

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.