ArticleJournal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society2015
Ultrasound-guided delivery of microRNA loaded nanoparticles into cancer.
Article in Journal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 64 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
64 citing papers in PubMed, 146 citations in OpenAlex.
- Enhanced-mRNA Delivery Using Ultrasound-Delivered Anchors for Bioorthogonal Ligation.Angewandte Chemie (International ed. in English) · 2026Article
- The Role of Acoustic Parameters in Droplet Vaporization of Perfluoropentane Nanodroplets forACS applied materials & interfaces · 2025Article
- Effects of low-intensity pulsed focal ultrasound-mediated delivery of endothelial progenitor-derived exosomes in tMCAo stroke.Frontiers in neurology · 2025Article
- Engineering Versatile Nanomedicines for Ultrasonic Tumor Immunotherapy.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2024Review
- Cancer theragnostics: closing the loop for advanced personalized cancer treatment through the platform integration of therapeutics and diagnostics.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2024Review
- Stage-specific treatment of colorectal cancer: A microRNA-nanocomposite approach.Journal of pharmaceutical analysis · 2023Review
- Nanoparticle Dynamics in Composite Hydrogels Exposed to Low-Frequency Focused Ultrasound.Gels (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Regulatory miRNAs in cancer cell recovery from therapy exposure and its implications as a novel therapeutic strategy for preventing disease recurrence.The Enzymes · 2023Article
- MicroRNAs and Their Big Therapeutic Impacts: Delivery Strategies for Cancer Intervention.Cells · 2022Review
- Reduced Cardiotoxicity of Ponatinib-Loaded PLGA-PEG-PLGA Nanoparticles in Zebrafish Xenograft Model.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Decoding Insulin-Like Growth Factor Signaling Pathway From a Non-coding RNAs Perspective: A Step Towards Precision Oncology in Breast Cancer.Journal of mammary gland biology and neoplasia · 2022Review
- Engineered Cell-Derived Vesicles Displaying Targeting Peptide and Functionalized with Nanocarriers for Therapeutic microRNA Delivery to Triple-Negative Breast Cancer in Mice.Advanced healthcare materials · 2022Article
- Mechanistic Insights and Therapeutic Delivery through Micro/Nanobubble-Assisted Ultrasound.Pharmaceutics · 2022Review
- The Advances and Biomedical Applications of Imageable Nanomaterials.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2022Review
- Ultrasound-Guided Microbubble-Mediated Locoregional Delivery of Multiple MicroRNAs Improves Chemotherapy in Hepatocellular Carcinoma.Nanotheranostics · 2022Article
- Ultrasound-Targeted Microbubble Destruction: Modulation in the Tumor Microenvironment and Application in Tumor Immunotherapy.Frontiers in immunology · 2022Review
- Ultrasound-targeted nucleic acid delivery for solid tumor therapy.Journal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society · 2021Review
- Sonoporation Using Nanoparticle-Loaded Microbubbles Increases Cellular Uptake of Nanoparticles Compared to Co-Incubation of Nanoparticles and Microbubbles.Pharmaceutics · 2021Article
- Passive Cavitation Mapping by Cavitation Source Localization From Aperture-Domain Signals-Part I: Theory and Validation Through Simulations.IEEE transactions on ultrasonics, ferroelectrics, and frequency control · 2021Article
- Passive Cavitation Mapping by Cavitation Source Localization From Aperture-Domain Signals-Part II: Phantom and In Vivo Experiments.IEEE transactions on ultrasonics, ferroelectrics, and frequency control · 2021Article
4 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
13 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Ultrasound induced microbubble cavitation can cause enhanced permeability across natural barriers of tumors such as vessel walls or cellular membranes, allowing for enhanced therapeutic delivery into the target tissues. While enhanced delivery of small (<1nm) molecules has been shown at acoustic pressures below 1MPa both in vitro and in vivo, the delivery efficiency of larger (>100nm) therapeutic carriers into cancer remains unclear and may require a higher pressure for sufficient delivery. Enhanced delivery of larger therapeutic carriers such as FDA approved pegylated poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid) nanoparticles (PLGA-PEG-NP) has significant clinical value because these nanoparticles have been shown to protect encapsulated drugs from degradation in the blood circulation and allow for slow and prolonged release of encapsulated drugs at the target location. In this study, various acoustic parameters were investigated to facilitate the successful delivery of two nanocarriers, a fluorescent semiconducting polymer model drug nanoparticle as well as PLGA-PEG-NP into human colon cancer xenografts in mice. We first measured the cavitation dose produced by various acoustic parameters (pressure, pulse length, and pulse repetition frequency) and microbubble concentration in a tissue mimicking phantom. Next, in vivo studies were performed to evaluate the penetration depth of nanocarriers using various acoustic pressures, ranging between 1.7 and 6.9MPa. Finally, a therapeutic microRNA, miR-122, was loaded into PLGA-PEG-NP and the amount of delivered miR-122 was assessed using quantitative RT-PCR. Our results show that acoustic pressures had the strongest effect on cavitation. An increase of the pressure from 0.8 to 6.9MPa resulted in a nearly 50-fold increase in cavitation in phantom experiments. In vivo, as the pressures increased from 1.7 to 6.9MPa, the amount of nanoparticles deposited in cancer xenografts was increased from 4- to 14-fold, and the median penetration depth of extravasated nanoparticles was increased from 1.3-fold to 3-fold, compared to control conditions without ultrasound, as examined on 3D confocal microscopy. When delivering miR-122 loaded PLGA-PEG-NP using optimal acoustic settings with minimum tissue damage, miR-122 delivery into tumors with ultrasound and microbubbles was 7.9-fold higher compared to treatment without ultrasound. This study demonstrates that ultrasound induced microbubble cavitation can be a useful tool for delivery of therapeutic miR loaded nanocarriers into cancer in vivo.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.