Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25687301›Full record

ArticleMethods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.)2016

Induced Pluripotent Stem (iPS) Cell Culture Methods and Induction of Differentiation into Endothelial Cells.

Ishita Chatterjee, Fei Li, Erin E Kohler, Jalees Rehman, Asrar B Malik, Kishore K Wary

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.), 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Advancing marine invertebrate cell line research: four key knowledge gaps.In vitro cellular & developmental biology. Animal · 2025
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Resident vascular Sca1iScience · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Induced Pluripotency: A Powerful Tool for In Vitro Modeling.International journal of molecular sciences · 2020
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Ishita ChatterjeeDepartment of Pharmacology, University of Illinois at Chicago, 835 S. Wolcott Ave., Chicago, IL, 60612, USA.
Fei LiDepartment of Pharmacology, University of Illinois at Chicago, 835 S. Wolcott Ave., Chicago, IL, 60612, USA.
Erin E KohlerDepartment of Pharmacology, University of Illinois at Chicago, 835 S. Wolcott Ave., Chicago, IL, 60612, USA.
Jalees RehmanDepartment of Pharmacology, University of Illinois at Chicago, 835 S. Wolcott Ave., Chicago, IL, 60612, USA.
Asrar B MalikDepartment of Pharmacology, University of Illinois at Chicago, 835 S. Wolcott Ave., Chicago, IL, 60612, USA.
Kishore K WaryDepartment of Pharmacology, University of Illinois at Chicago, 835 S. Wolcott Ave., Chicago, IL, 60612, USA. kkwary@uic.edu.
University of Illinois Chicago · US

Funding

Regulation of Wnt Signaling by PAP2b During AngiogenesisR01HL079356 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT CHICAGO · PI WARY, KISHORE K · 2006 to 2016
$3.0M
NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL079356
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The study of stem cell behavior and differentiation in a developmental context is complex, time-consuming, and expensive, and for this reason, cell culture remains a method of choice for developmental and regenerative biology and mechanistic studies. Similar to ES cells, iPS cells have the ability to differentiate into endothelial cells (ECs), and the route for differentiation appears to mimic the developmental process that occurs during the formation of an embryo. Traditional EC induction methods from embryonic stem (ES) cells rely mostly on the formation of embryoid body (EB), which employs feeder or feeder-free conditions in the presence or absence of supporting cells. Similar to ES cells, iPS cells can be cultured in feeder layer or feeder-free conditions. Here, we describe the iPS cell culture methods and induction differentiation of these cells into ECs. We use anti-mouse Flk1 and anti-mouse VE-cadherin to isolate and characterize mouse ECs, because these antibodies are commercially available and their use has been described in the literature, including by our group. The ECs produced by this method have been used by our laboratory, and we have demonstrated their in vivo potential. We also discuss how iPS cells differ in their ability to differentiate into endothelial cells in culture.

Indexed as

AnimalsAntibodies, MonoclonalAntigens, CDCadherin 5CadherinsCell Culture TechniquesCell DifferentiationCells, CulturedCellular ReprogrammingCellular Reprogramming TechniquesCryopreservationEmbryonic Stem CellsEndothelial CellsHindlimbInduced Pluripotent Stem CellsIschemiaAntibodies, MonoclonalAntigens, CDCadherin 5CadherinsKlf4 protein, mouseKruppel-Like Factor 4Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Receptor-2AngiogenesisCD31Endothelial cellsFlk1iPS cellsKlf4NanogOct4Sox2VE-cadherin

Identifiers

PMID25687301
PMCPMC4539286
OpenAlexW2397410945

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.