Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25687034›Full record

ArticleJournal of nephrology2015

Deficits in information transfer between hospital-based and primary-care physicians, the case of kidney disease: a cross-sectional study.

Bénédicte Sautenet, Agnès Caille, Bruno Giraudeau, Julie Léger, Patrick Vourc'h, Matthias Buchler, Jean-Michel Halimi

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of nephrology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
7.5field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. The Quality of Discharge Summaries After Acute Kidney Injury.Canadian journal of kidney health and disease · 2023
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Individualized acute kidney injury after care.Current opinion in critical care · 2020
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Bénédicte SautenetService de Néphrologie-Immunologie Clinique, CHU de Tours, Hôpital Bretonneau, 37044, Tours, France. benedicte.sautenet@univ-tours.fr.
Agnès CailleCentre d'Investigation Clinique INSERM, CIC 1415, Tours, France.
Bruno GiraudeauCentre d'Investigation Clinique INSERM, CIC 1415, Tours, France.
Julie LégerCentre d'Investigation Clinique INSERM, CIC 1415, Tours, France.
Patrick Vourc'hCHU de Tours, Laboratoire de Biochimie et Biologie Moléculaire, Tours, France.
Matthias BuchlerService de Néphrologie-Immunologie Clinique, CHU de Tours, Hôpital Bretonneau, 37044, Tours, France.
Jean-Michel HalimiService de Néphrologie-Immunologie Clinique, CHU de Tours, Hôpital Bretonneau, 37044, Tours, France.
Université de Tours · FRBretonneau Hospital · FRCentre Hospitalier Universitaire de Tours · FRClinical Investigation Center Plurithematic Tours · FRInserm · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLate recognition plays an important role in prognosis associated with kidney disease; thus, information transfer at hospital discharge regarding kidney disease is crucial. Whether it is notified in patients' hospital discharge summary (HDS) is presently largely unknown. STUDY

designCross-sectional. SETTING AND

participantsThe prevalence of kidney dysfunction [estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) <60 ml/min/1.73 m(2)] and its reporting to primary-care physicians from 26 units [11 surgery, 11 medical, 4 intensive care units (ICUs)] of a university hospital were analyzed in 14,000 hospitalizations. PREDICTOR: eGFR. OUTCOME: Notification of kidney dysfunction in HDS. MEASUREMENTS: GFR was estimated from serum creatinine using the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease formula.

resultsKidney dysfunction was frequent (27.2 %) but infrequently notified in the main-body of the HDS (overall 25.3 %, medical 25 %, surgical 16.3 %, ICU 48.4 %) even when severe (eGFR 15-29.9 ml/min/1.73 m(2) was notified in 68.8, 38.5, and 79.8 % of HDSs in medical, surgical and ICUs, respectively). Notification in the HDS conclusion was rare (overall 11.4 %, medical 9.8 %, surgical 8.4 %, ICU 27.5 %). Reporting remained low when eGFR remained abnormal at discharge (medical 35.8 %, surgical 22.5 %, ICU 62.2 %) but was worse for acute kidney injury (16.0, 17.1, and 37.7 %, respectively). The optimal eGFR cut-off for reporting was 39 ml/min/1.73 m(2). Longer durations of hospitalization, greater numbers of creatinine measurements and of abnormal eGFR were associated with notification, regardless of the type of unit. LIMITATIONS: Lack of data to define acute or chronic kidney injury with precision.

conclusionsKidney dysfunction is frequent in hospitalized patients but is usually not notified, even when severe or still present at discharge, suggesting that it is not considered important to disclose to primary-care physicians. This lack of information may decrease physicians' awareness, and may affect continuity of care in patients with kidney dysfunction.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overContinuity of Patient CareCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleGlomerular Filtration RateHealth Information ExchangeHealth Information SystemsHospitalsHumansKidney DiseasesKidney Function TestsMaleMiddle AgedPhysicians, Primary CareHospital discharge summaryInformationKidney diseasePrimary-care physician

Identifiers

PMID25687034
OpenAlexW1970009602

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.