ArticleJournal of nephrology2015
Deficits in information transfer between hospital-based and primary-care physicians, the case of kidney disease: a cross-sectional study.
Article in Journal of nephrology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.
- Top ten tips to manage patients after acute kidney injury.Clinical kidney journal · 2026Review
- Nephrologist's Perceptions of Risk of Severe Chronic Kidney Disease and Outpatient Follow-up After Hospitalization With AKI: Multinational Randomized Survey Study.Canadian journal of kidney health and disease · 2025Article
- Acute kidney injury as a key predictor of cardiovascular events in chronic kidney disease patients: the CKD-REIN study.Clinical kidney journal · 2024Article
- The Quality of Discharge Summaries After Acute Kidney Injury.Canadian journal of kidney health and disease · 2023Article
- Use of Guideline-Based Therapy for Diabetes, Coronary Artery Disease, and Chronic Kidney Disease After Acute Kidney Injury: A Retrospective Observational Study.Canadian journal of kidney health and disease · 2022Article
- Discharge Documentation and Follow-Up of Critically Ill Patients With Acute Kidney Injury Treated With Kidney Replacement Therapy: A Retrospective Cohort Study.Frontiers in medicine · 2021Article
- Individualized acute kidney injury after care.Current opinion in critical care · 2020Review
- Implementing post-discharge care following acute kidney injury in England: a single-centre qualitative evaluation.BMJ open · 2020Article
- Article
- The intensive care medicine agenda on acute kidney injury.Intensive care medicine · 2017Review
- Hospital discharge communications during care transitions for patients with acute kidney injury: a cross-sectional study.BMC health services research · 2016Article
- Establishing a continuum of acute kidney injury - tracing AKI using data source linkage and long-term follow-up: Workgroup Statements from the 15th ADQI Consensus Conference.Canadian journal of kidney health and disease · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundLate recognition plays an important role in prognosis associated with kidney disease; thus, information transfer at hospital discharge regarding kidney disease is crucial. Whether it is notified in patients' hospital discharge summary (HDS) is presently largely unknown. STUDY
designCross-sectional. SETTING AND
participantsThe prevalence of kidney dysfunction [estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) <60 ml/min/1.73 m(2)] and its reporting to primary-care physicians from 26 units [11 surgery, 11 medical, 4 intensive care units (ICUs)] of a university hospital were analyzed in 14,000 hospitalizations. PREDICTOR: eGFR. OUTCOME: Notification of kidney dysfunction in HDS. MEASUREMENTS: GFR was estimated from serum creatinine using the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease formula.
resultsKidney dysfunction was frequent (27.2 %) but infrequently notified in the main-body of the HDS (overall 25.3 %, medical 25 %, surgical 16.3 %, ICU 48.4 %) even when severe (eGFR 15-29.9 ml/min/1.73 m(2) was notified in 68.8, 38.5, and 79.8 % of HDSs in medical, surgical and ICUs, respectively). Notification in the HDS conclusion was rare (overall 11.4 %, medical 9.8 %, surgical 8.4 %, ICU 27.5 %). Reporting remained low when eGFR remained abnormal at discharge (medical 35.8 %, surgical 22.5 %, ICU 62.2 %) but was worse for acute kidney injury (16.0, 17.1, and 37.7 %, respectively). The optimal eGFR cut-off for reporting was 39 ml/min/1.73 m(2). Longer durations of hospitalization, greater numbers of creatinine measurements and of abnormal eGFR were associated with notification, regardless of the type of unit. LIMITATIONS: Lack of data to define acute or chronic kidney injury with precision.
conclusionsKidney dysfunction is frequent in hospitalized patients but is usually not notified, even when severe or still present at discharge, suggesting that it is not considered important to disclose to primary-care physicians. This lack of information may decrease physicians' awareness, and may affect continuity of care in patients with kidney dysfunction.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.