Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25686675›Full record

ArticleClinical biomechanics (Bristol, Avon)2015

Sensorimotor function of the cervical spine in healthy volunteers.

Neil J Artz, Michael A Adams, Patricia Dolan

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical biomechanics (Bristol, Avon), 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 46 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. [Research progress on mechanical performance evaluation of artificial intervertebral disc].Sheng wu yi xue gong cheng xue za zhi = Journal of biomedical engineering = Shengwu yixue gongchengxue zazhi · 2018
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Neil J ArtzCentre for Comparative and Clinical Anatomy, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
Michael A AdamsCentre for Comparative and Clinical Anatomy, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
Patricia DolanCentre for Comparative and Clinical Anatomy, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK. Electronic address: Trish.Dolan@bris.ac.uk.
University of Bristol · GB

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSensorimotor mechanisms are important for controlling head motion. However, relatively little is known about sensorimotor function in the cervical spine. This study investigated how age, gender and variations in the test conditions affect measures of position sense, movement sense and reflex activation in cervical muscles.

methodsForty healthy volunteers (19M/21F, aged 19-59 years) participated. Position sense was assessed by determining repositioning errors in upright and flexed neck postures during tests performed in 25%, 50% and 75% cervical flexion. Movement sense was assessed by detecting thresholds to passive flexion and extension at velocities between 1 and 25°s(-1). Reflexes were assessed by determining the latency and amplitude of reflex activation in trapezius and sternocleidomastoid muscles. Reliability was evaluated from intraclass correlation coefficients.

findingsMean repositioning errors ranged from 1.5° to 2.6°, were greater in flexed than upright postures (P=0.006) and in people aged over 25 years (P=0.05). Time to detect head motion decreased with increasing velocity (P<0.001) and was lower during flexion than extension movements (P=0.002). Reflexes demonstrated shorter latency (P<0.001) and greater amplitude (P=0.009) in trapezius compared to sternocleidomastoid, and became slower and weaker with age. None of the measures were influenced by gender. Reliability was good for movement sense measures, but was influenced by the test conditions when assessing position sense.

interpretationIncreased repositioning errors and slower reflexes in older subjects suggest that sensorimotor function in the cervical spine becomes impaired with age. In position sense tests, reliability was influenced by the test conditions with mid-range flexion movements, performed in standing, providing the most reliable measurements.

Indexed as

AdultAge FactorsCervical VertebraeFemaleHealthy VolunteersHumansMaleMiddle AgedMovementNeck MusclesPostureProprioceptionReflexReproducibility of ResultsSex FactorsCervical spineMovement senseNeck musclesPosition senseProprioceptionReflex activation

Identifiers

PMID25686675
PMCPMC4372261
OpenAlexW2146758997

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.