Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25686640›Full record

SynthesisPublic health nutrition2015

A systematic review on empowerment for healthy nutrition in health promotion.

Susanne Brandstetter, Jana Rüter, Janina Curbach, Julika Loss

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Public health nutrition, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Pregnant Women's Experiences With a Collaborative Midwife-Dietitian Empowerment Programme to Improve Diet Quality.Journal of human nutrition and dietetics : the official journal of the British Dietetic Association · 2025
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Understanding empowerment for a healthy dietary intake during pregnancy.International journal of qualitative studies on health and well-being · 2021
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Susanne BrandstetterUniversity of Regensburg,Medical Sociology,Institute of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine,Dr.-Gessler-Strasse 17,93051 Regensburg,Germany.
Jana RüterUniversity of Regensburg,Medical Sociology,Institute of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine,Dr.-Gessler-Strasse 17,93051 Regensburg,Germany.
Janina CurbachUniversity of Regensburg,Medical Sociology,Institute of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine,Dr.-Gessler-Strasse 17,93051 Regensburg,Germany.
Julika LossUniversity of Regensburg,Medical Sociology,Institute of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine,Dr.-Gessler-Strasse 17,93051 Regensburg,Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe present review aimed to identify and synthesize studies that used an empowerment approach within the field of healthy nutrition.

designA systematic review was conducted. Studies were identified by database searching (PubMed, PsycINFO, Web of Science and Psyndex). Searching, selecting and reporting were done according to the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses) Statement.

settingHealth promotion including the subject of healthy nutrition. SUBJECTS: Individuals from non-clinical populations.

resultsA total of 1226 studies were screened for eligibility, eight studies were finally included. Three studies used the empowerment approach within a qualitative research paradigm and five studies within (quasi-) experimental intervention studies. Heterogeneity in settings, samples and evaluation methods was high. Most studies referred to the key message of empowerment, i.e. taking control over one's own life. However, the ways in which this key message was implemented in the interventions differed considerably.

conclusionsThe number of studies included was very low. Furthermore, most studies had some limitations in terms of reporting how the empowerment approach was actually applied. The empowerment approach still seems to be unfamiliar within the field of healthy nutrition.

Indexed as

DietGlobal HealthHealth PromotionNutritional StatusNutrition PolicyPower, PsychologicalFood SupplyHumansMalnutritionPersonal AutonomySocioeconomic FactorsEmpowermentHealth promotionHealthy nutritionSystematic review

Identifiers

PMID25686640
PMCPMC10271847

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.