Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25685989›Full record

ArticleStem cells and development2015

Transplanted Umbilical Cord Mesenchymal Stem Cells Modify the In Vivo Microenvironment Enhancing Angiogenesis and Leading to Bone Regeneration.

Maria Rosa Todeschi, Rania El Backly, Chiara Capelli, Antonio Daga, Eugenio Patrone, Martino Introna, Ranieri Cancedda, Maddalena Mastrogiacomo

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Stem cells and development, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 49 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
49citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.9field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

49 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 99 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Vascularized Tissue Organoids.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Umbilical cord mesenchymal stromal cells-from bench to bedside.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2022
    Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Maria Rosa Todeschi1 Department of Experimental Medicine (DIMES), University of Genoa , Genoa, Italy .
Rania El Backly1 Department of Experimental Medicine (DIMES), University of Genoa , Genoa, Italy .
Chiara Capelli3 A.O.Papa Giovanni XXIII-USS Center of Cell Therapy "G. Lanzani" USC Hematology , Bergamo, Italy .
Antonio Daga4 IRCCS AOU San Martino-IST National Cancer Research Institute , Genoa, Italy .
Eugenio Patrone5 Department of Prosthetic Dentistry, University of Genoa , Genoa, Italy .
Martino Introna3 A.O.Papa Giovanni XXIII-USS Center of Cell Therapy "G. Lanzani" USC Hematology , Bergamo, Italy .
Ranieri Cancedda1 Department of Experimental Medicine (DIMES), University of Genoa , Genoa, Italy .
Maddalena Mastrogiacomo1 Department of Experimental Medicine (DIMES), University of Genoa , Genoa, Italy .
University of Genoa · ITAlexandria University · EG

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Umbilical cord mesenchymal stem cells (UC-MSCs) show properties similar to bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells (BM-MSCs), although controversial data exist regarding their osteogenic potential. We prepared clinical-grade UC-MSCs from Wharton's Jelly and we investigated if UC-MSCs could be used as substitutes for BM-MSCs in muscoloskeletal regeneration as a more readily available and functional source of MSCs. UC-MSCs were loaded onto scaffolds and implanted subcutaneously (ectopically) and in critical-sized calvarial defects (orthotopically) in mice. For live cell-tracking experiments, UC-MSCs were first transduced with the luciferase gene. Angiogenic properties of UC-MSCs were tested using the mouse metatarsal angiogenesis assay. Cell secretomes were screened for the presence of various cytokines using an array assay. Analysis of implanted scaffolds showed that UC-MSCs, contrary to BM-MSCs, remained detectable in the implants for 3 weeks at most and did not induce bone formation in an ectopic location. Instead, they induced a significant increase of blood vessel ingrowth. In agreement with these observations, UC-MSC-conditioned medium presented a distinct and stronger proinflammatory/chemotactic cytokine profile than BM-MSCs and a significantly enhanced angiogenic activity. When UC-MSCs were orthotopically transplanted in a calvarial defect, they promoted increased bone formation as well as BM-MSCs. However, at variance with BM-MSCs, the new bone was deposited through the activity of stimulated host cells, highlighting the importance of the microenvironment on determining cell commitment and response. Therefore, we propose, as therapy for bone lesions, the use of allogeneic UC-MSCs by not depositing bone matrix directly, but acting through the activation of endogenous repair mechanisms.

Indexed as

Bone RegenerationMesenchymal Stem Cell TransplantationNeovascularization, PhysiologicStem Cell NicheAnimalsCells, CulturedFemaleHumansMesenchymal Stem CellsMiceTissue ScaffoldsUmbilical Cord

Identifiers

PMID25685989
PMCPMC4499786
OpenAlexW2005472583

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.