Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25685830›Full record

ArticleEBioMedicine2014

An Endotoxin Tolerance Signature Predicts Sepsis and Organ Dysfunction at Initial Clinical Presentation.

Olga M Pena, David G Hancock, Ngan H Lyle, Adam Linder, James A Russell, Jianguo Xia, Christopher D Fjell, John H Boyd, Robert E W Hancock

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in EBioMedicine, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04118179 (Development of a New Strategy to Predict Early Sepsis), which is not on this map. Cited by 89 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
89citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
6.6field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04118179 unknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2018, after this paper: background citation

Development of a New Strategy to Predict Early Sepsis

TypeobservationalSponsorUniversity of British ColumbiaRan2018 to 2023Enrolled1,000ConditionsSepsisArmsBlood sample collection
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

89 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 149 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Immunometabolic chaos in septic shock.Journal of leukocyte biology · 2025
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Lactate and Lactylation in Sepsis: A Comprehensive Review.Journal of inflammation research · 2024
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Antibiotic failure: Beyond antimicrobial resistance.Drug resistance updates : reviews and commentaries in antimicrobial and anticancer chemotherapy · 2023
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review

29 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Olga M PenaCentre for Microbial Diseases and Immunity Research, 2259 Lower Mall Research Station, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia V6T 1Z4, Canada.
David G HancockFlinders University Medical School, GPO Box 2100, Adelaide 5001, South Australia, Australia.
Ngan H LyleCentre for Microbial Diseases and Immunity Research, 2259 Lower Mall Research Station, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia V6T 1Z4, Canada.
Adam LinderDivision of Critical Care Medicine, University of British Columbia at St Paul's Hospital, P3311 1081 Burrard Street, Vancouver, British Columbia V6Z 1Y6, Canada.
James A RussellCentre for Microbial Diseases and Immunity Research, 2259 Lower Mall Research Station, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia V6T 1Z4, Canada.
Jianguo XiaCentre for Microbial Diseases and Immunity Research, 2259 Lower Mall Research Station, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia V6T 1Z4, Canada.
Christopher D FjellCentre for Microbial Diseases and Immunity Research, 2259 Lower Mall Research Station, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia V6T 1Z4, Canada ; Division of Critical Care Medicine, University of British Columbia at St Paul's Hospital, P3311 1081 Burrard Street, Vancouver, British Columbia V6Z 1Y6, Canada.
John H BoydDivision of Critical Care Medicine, University of British Columbia at St Paul's Hospital, P3311 1081 Burrard Street, Vancouver, British Columbia V6Z 1Y6, Canada.
Robert E W HancockCentre for Microbial Diseases and Immunity Research, 2259 Lower Mall Research Station, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia V6T 1Z4, Canada ; Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute, Cambridgeshire, United Kingdom.
University of British Columbia · CAFlinders University · AUSt. Paul's Hospital · CAWellcome Sanger Institute · GB

Funding

Wellcome Trust 098051
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSepsis involves aberrant immune responses to infection, but the exact nature of this immune dysfunction remains poorly defined. Bacterial endotoxins like lipopolysaccharide (LPS) are potent inducers of inflammation, which has been associated with the pathophysiology of sepsis, but repeated exposure can also induce a suppressive effect known as endotoxin tolerance or cellular reprogramming. It has been proposed that endotoxin tolerance might be associated with the immunosuppressive state that was primarily observed during late-stage sepsis. However, this relationship remains poorly characterised. Here we clarify the underlying mechanisms and timing of immune dysfunction in sepsis.

methodsWe defined a gene expression signature characteristic of endotoxin tolerance. Gene-set test approaches were used to correlate this signature with early sepsis, both newly and retrospectively analysing microarrays from 593 patients in 11 cohorts. Then we recruited a unique cohort of possible sepsis patients at first clinical presentation in an independent blinded controlled observational study to determine whether this signature was associated with the development of confirmed sepsis and organ dysfunction.

findingsAll sepsis patients presented an expression profile strongly associated with the endotoxin tolerance signature (p < 0.01; AUC 96.1%). Importantly, this signature further differentiated between suspected sepsis patients who did, or did not, go on to develop confirmed sepsis, and predicted the development of organ dysfunction.

interpretationOur data support an updated model of sepsis pathogenesis in which endotoxin tolerance-mediated immune dysfunction (cellular reprogramming) is present throughout the clinical course of disease and related to disease severity. Thus endotoxin tolerance might offer new insights guiding the development of new therapies and diagnostics for early sepsis.

Indexed as

Cellular reprogrammingDiagnosisEndotoxin toleranceImmune dysfunctionSepsisSevere sepsisSignature

Identifiers

PMID25685830
PMCPMC4326653
OpenAlexW2076890629

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.