ArticleNeuroImage. Clinical2015
Content-based image retrieval for brain MRI: an image-searching engine and population-based analysis to utilize past clinical data for future diagnosis.
Article in NeuroImage. Clinical, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed, 40 citations in OpenAlex.
- Content-Based Medical Image Retrieval and Intelligent Interactive Visual Browser for Medical Education, Research and Care.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- Multimodal MRI assessment for first episode psychosis: A major change in the thalamus and an efficient stratification of a subgroup.Human brain mapping · 2021Article
- Deep Learning in Large and Multi-Site Structural Brain MR Imaging Datasets.Frontiers in neuroinformatics · 2021Review
- Structural neuroimaging of the altered brain stemming from pediatric and adolescent hearing loss-Scientific and clinical challenges.Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. Systems biology and medicine · 2020Review
- Article
- Identifying patients with neuronal intranuclear inclusion disease in Singapore using characteristic diffusion-weighted MR images.Neuroradiology · 2019Article
- Radiological images and machine learning: Trends, perspectives, and prospects.Computers in biology and medicine · 2019Review
- Baby brain atlases.NeuroImage · 2019Review
- Whole-brain Segmentation and Change-point Analysis of Anatomical Brain MRI-Application in Premanifest Huntington's Disease.Journal of visualized experiments : JoVE · 2018Article
- Overview on subjective similarity of images for content-based medical image retrieval.Radiological physics and technology · 2018Review
- Textile Retrieval Based on Image Content from CDC and Webcam Cameras in Indoor Environments.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2018Article
- Mapping the order and pattern of brain structural MRI changes using change-point analysis in premanifest Huntington's disease.Human brain mapping · 2017Article
- Structural signature of classical versus late-onset friedreich's ataxia by Multimodality brain MRI.Human brain mapping · 2017Article
- Brain MRI Pattern Recognition Translated to Clinical Scenarios.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2017Article
- Resource atlases for multi-atlas brain segmentations with multiple ontology levels based on T1-weighted MRI.NeuroImage · 2016Article
- Linking white matter and deep gray matter alterations in premanifest Huntington disease.NeuroImage. Clinical · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Radiological diagnosis is based on subjective judgment by radiologists. The reasoning behind this process is difficult to document and share, which is a major obstacle in adopting evidence-based medicine in radiology. We report our attempt to use a comprehensive brain parcellation tool to systematically capture image features and use them to record, search, and evaluate anatomical phenotypes. Anatomical images (T1-weighted MRI) were converted to a standardized index by using a high-dimensional image transformation method followed by atlas-based parcellation of the entire brain. We investigated how the indexed anatomical data captured the anatomical features of healthy controls and a population with Primary Progressive Aphasia (PPA). PPA was chosen because patients have apparent atrophy at different degrees and locations, thus the automated quantitative results can be compared with trained clinicians' qualitative evaluations. We explored and tested the power of individual classifications and of performing a search for images with similar anatomical features in a database using partial least squares-discriminant analysis (PLS-DA) and principal component analysis (PCA). The agreement between the automated z-score and the averaged visual scores for atrophy (r = 0.8) was virtually the same as the inter-evaluator agreement. The PCA plot distribution correlated with the anatomical phenotypes and the PLS-DA resulted in a model with an accuracy of 88% for distinguishing PPA variants. The quantitative indices captured the main anatomical features. The indexing of image data has a potential to be an effective, comprehensive, and easily translatable tool for clinical practice, providing new opportunities to mine clinical databases for medical decision support.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.