ReviewWorld journal of gastrointestinal pathophysiology2015
Laboratory markers in ulcerative colitis: Current insights and future advances.
Review in World journal of gastrointestinal pathophysiology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 52 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
52 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 143 citations in OpenAlex.
- Prevalence of metabolic syndrome in patients with inflammatory bowel disease: a meta-analysis on a global scale.Journal of health, population, and nutrition · 2025Pooled it
- WSES-AAST guidelines: management of inflammatory bowel disease in the emergency setting.World journal of emergency surgery : WJES · 2021Guideline
- Effects of Spirulina supplementation in patients with ulcerative colitis: a double-blind, placebo-controlled randomized trial.BMC complementary medicine and therapies · 2024Trial
- Metabolic Profiling of the Gut-Brain Axis in a Murine Model of Ulcerative Colitis with Raman Spectroscopy.ACS applied materials & interfaces · 2026Article
- Partial responders to intravenous corticosteroids at day 3 benefit from continued therapy in acute severe ulcerative colitis.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Clinical Outcomes of Oat Beta-Glucan Nutritional Intervention in Ulcerative Colitis: Case Reports of a Female and a Male Patient.Nutrients · 2025Article
- Silybum marianum seeds mitigate pro-inflammatory functions of human neutrophils and alleviate ulcerative colitis in rats.Inflammopharmacology · 2025Article
- Employing complementary fractionation-based N-terminomics approaches enhances the identification of legumain cleavage events in naïve and inflamed colon tissue.Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society · 2025Article
- Clinical and Phenotypic Characteristics of Early-Onset Inflammatory Bowel Disease: A Five-Year Observational Study.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Article
- Sodium propionate modulates gut microbiota and blood parameters in healthy mice.Frontiers in microbiology · 2025Article
- Transcriptional profiling identification of inflammatory signaling pathways in ulcerative colitis.PloS one · 2025Article
- Precision Medicine in Inflammatory Bowel Disease: A Spotlight on Emerging Molecular Biomarkers.Biomedicines · 2024Review
- miR-155 and miR-21 as Diagnostic and Therapeutic Biomarkers for Ulcerative Colitis: There Is Still a Long Way to Go.Biomedicines · 2024Article
- Article
- Review
- The accuracy of point-of-care C-Reactive Protein as a screening test for tuberculosis in children.PLOS global public health · 2024Article
- Predictive Value of MHR and NLR for Ulcerative Colitis Disease Activity.International journal of general medicine · 2024Article
- Single-cell analysis identifies phospholysine phosphohistidine inorganic pyrophosphate phosphatase as a target in ulcerative colitis.World journal of gastroenterology · 2023Article
- Assessing vitamin D as a biomarker in inflammatory bowel disease.JGH open : an open access journal of gastroenterology and hepatology · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Ulcerative colitis (UC) and Crohn's disease (CD) are the major forms of inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD) in man. Despite some common features, these forms can be distinguished by different genetic predisposition, risk factors and clinical, endoscopic and histological characteristics. The aetiology of both CD and UC remains unknown, but several evidences suggest that CD and perhaps UC are due to an excessive immune response directed against normal constituents of the intestinal bacterial flora. Tests sometimes invasive are routine for the diagnosis and care of patients with IBD. Diagnosis of UC is based on clinical symptoms combined with radiological and endoscopic investigations. The employment of non-invasive biomarkers is needed. These biomarkers have the potential to avoid invasive diagnostic tests that may result in discomfort and potential complications. The ability to determine the type, severity, prognosis and response to therapy of UC, using biomarkers has long been a goal of clinical researchers. We describe the biomarkers assessed in UC, with special reference to acute-phase proteins and serologic markers and thereafter, we describe the new biological markers and the biological markers could be developed in the future: (1) serum markers of acute phase response: The laboratory tests most used to measure the acute-phase proteins in clinical practice are the serum concentration of C-reactive protein and the erythrocyte sedimentation rate. Other biomarkers of inflammation in UC include platelet count, leukocyte count, and serum albumin and serum orosomucoid concentrations; (2) serologic markers/antibodies: In the last decades serological and immunologic biomarkers have been studied extensively in immunology and have been used in clinical practice to detect specific pathologies. In UC, the presence of these antibodies can aid as surrogate markers for the aberrant host immune response; and (3) future biomarkers: The development of biomarkers in UC will be very important in the future. The progress of molecular biology tools (microarrays, proteomics and nanotechnology) have revolutionised the field of the biomarker discovery. The advances in bioinformatics coupled with cross-disciplinary collaborations have greatly enhanced our ability to retrieve, characterize and analyse large amounts of data generated by the technological advances. The techniques available for biomarkers development are genomics (single nucleotide polymorphism genotyping, pharmacogenetics and gene expression analyses) and proteomics. In the future, the addition of new serological markers will add significant benefit. Correlating serologic markers with genotypes and clinical phenotypes should enhance our understanding of pathophysiology of UC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.