Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25685369›Full record

ArticleSultan Qaboos University medical journal2015

Trends in Epithelial Cell Abnormalities Observed on Cervical Smears over a 21-Year Period in a Tertiary Care Hospital in Kuwait.

Kusum Kapila, Prem N Sharma, Sara S George, Azza Al-Shaheen, Ahlam Al-Juwaiser, Rana Al-Awadhi

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sultan Qaboos University medical journal, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Kusum KapilaDepartment of Pathology, Nursing, Kuwait University, Safat, Kuwait;
Prem N SharmaHealth Science Centre, Faculty of Medicine, Nursing, Kuwait University, Safat, Kuwait;
Sara S GeorgeDepartment of Pathology, Nursing, Kuwait University, Safat, Kuwait;
Azza Al-ShaheenCytopathology Laboratory, Mubarak Al-Kabeer Hospital, Safat, Kuwait.
Ahlam Al-JuwaiserCytopathology Laboratory, Mubarak Al-Kabeer Hospital, Safat, Kuwait.
Rana Al-AwadhiFaculty of Allied Health Sciences & Nursing, Kuwait University, Safat, Kuwait;
Kuwait University · KWMubarak Al Kabeer Hospital · KW

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThis study aimed to analyse trends in epithelial cell abnormalities (ECAs) in cervical cytology at a tertiary care hospital in Kuwait.

methodsECAs in 135,766 reports were compared over three seven-year periods between 1992 and 2012. Conventional Papanicolaou (Pap) smear tests were used in the first two periods and ThinPrep (Hologic Corp., Bedford, Massachusetts, USA) tests were used in the third.

resultsSignificant increases in satisfactory smears, atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance (ASCUS) and atypical glandular cells of undetermined significance/atypical glandular cells (AGUS/AGCs) were seen in the second and third periods (P <0.001). No significant increases were observed among low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions (LSILs) or high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions (HSILs) (P >0.05). An increase was noted in carcinomas between the first and second periods although a significant decline was seen in the third (P <0.014).

conclusionSatisfactory smears, ASCUS and AGUS/AGC increased during the study period although no significant increases in LSILs, HSILs or carcinomas were observed.

Indexed as

Cytological TechniquesEpithelial CellsKuwaitPapanicolaou SmearRetrospective Study

Identifiers

PMID25685369
PMCPMC4318590
OpenAlexW1523208804

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.