ArticleGigaScience2014
Clinical outcome of preimplantation genetic diagnosis and screening using next generation sequencing.
Article in GigaScience, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 36 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
36 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- A systematic review and meta-analysis of the diagnostic accuracy after preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy.PloS one · 2025Pooled it
- Accurate identification of abnormal ploidy using an artificial intelligence model in preimplantation genetic testing.Human reproduction open · 2025Article
- Clinical outcomes in carriers of insertional translocation: a retrospective analysis of comprehensive chromosome screening results.F&S reports · 2024Article
- Effect of Frozen-Thawed Embryo Transfer on the Metabolism of Children in Early Childhood.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023Article
- Ultra-low-coverage genome-wide association study-insights into gestational age using 17,844 embryo samples with preimplantation genetic testing.Genome medicine · 2023Article
- ESHRE good practice recommendations on recurrent implantation failure.Human reproduction open · 2023Article
- A case of complex balanced chromosomal translocations associated with adverse pregnancy outcomes.Molecular cytogenetics · 2022Article
- Preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A)-a single-center experience.Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics · 2022Article
- Article
- Risk Factors Affecting Alternate Segregation in Blastocysts From Preimplantation Genetic Testing Cycles of Autosomal Reciprocal Translocations.Frontiers in genetics · 2022Article
- A mathematical model for predicting the number of transferable blastocysts in next-generation sequencing-based preimplantation genetic testing.Archives of gynecology and obstetrics · 2022Article
- Reproductive outcomes after preimplantation genetic testing in mosaic Turner syndrome: a retrospective cohort study of 100 cycles.Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics · 2021Article
- Next-generation sequence-based preimplantation genetic testing for monogenic disease resulting from maternal mosaicism.Molecular genetics & genomic medicine · 2021Article
- Identifying Balanced Chromosomal Translocations in Human Embryos by Oxford Nanopore Sequencing and Breakpoints Region Analysis.Frontiers in genetics · 2021Article
- The genetic cause of intellectual deficiency and/or congenital malformations in two parental reciprocal translocation carriers and implications for assisted reproduction.Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics · 2021Article
- Whole-Genome Sequencing Reveals Exonic Variation ofFrontiers in medicine · 2021Article
- The effect of blastomere loss during frozen embryo transfer on the transcriptome of offspring's umbilical cord blood.Molecular biology reports · 2020Article
- Mitochondrial oxygen consumption rate of human embryos declines with maternal age.Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics · 2020Article
- Improved clinical outcomes of preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy using MALBAC-NGS compared with MDA-SNP array.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2020Article
- Successful clinical application of pre-implantation genetic diagnosis for infantile neuroaxonal dystrophy.Experimental and therapeutic medicine · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
25 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundNext generation sequencing (NGS) is now being used for detecting chromosomal abnormalities in blastocyst trophectoderm (TE) cells from in vitro fertilized embryos. However, few data are available regarding the clinical outcome, which provides vital reference for further application of the methodology. Here, we present a clinical evaluation of NGS-based preimplantation genetic diagnosis/screening (PGD/PGS) compared with single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) array-based PGD/PGS as a control.
resultsA total of 395 couples participated. They were carriers of either translocation or inversion mutations, or were patients with recurrent miscarriage and/or advanced maternal age. A total of 1,512 blastocysts were biopsied on D5 after fertilization, with 1,058 blastocysts set aside for SNP array testing and 454 blastocysts for NGS testing. In the NGS cycles group, the implantation, clinical pregnancy and miscarriage rates were 52.6% (60/114), 61.3% (49/80) and 14.3% (7/49), respectively. In the SNP array cycles group, the implantation, clinical pregnancy and miscarriage rates were 47.6% (139/292), 56.7% (115/203) and 14.8% (17/115), respectively. The outcome measures of both the NGS and SNP array cycles were the same with insignificant differences. There were 150 blastocysts that underwent both NGS and SNP array analysis, of which seven blastocysts were found with inconsistent signals. All other signals obtained from NGS analysis were confirmed to be accurate by validation with qPCR. The relative copy number of mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) for each blastocyst that underwent NGS testing was evaluated, and a significant difference was found between the copy number of mtDNA for the euploid and the chromosomally abnormal blastocysts. So far, out of 42 ongoing pregnancies, 24 babies were born in NGS cycles; all of these babies are healthy and free of any developmental problems.
conclusionsThis study provides the first evaluation of the clinical outcomes of NGS-based pre-implantation genetic diagnosis/screening, and shows the reliability of this method in a clinical and array-based laboratory setting. NGS provides an accurate approach to detect embryonic imbalanced segmental rearrangements, to avoid the potential risks of false signals from SNP array in this study.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.