ArticlePatient safety in surgery2015
The 'Aachen Falls Prevention Scale' - development of a tool for self-assessment of elderly patients at risk for ground level falls.
Article in Patient safety in surgery, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed.
- Relationship of Community Mobility, Vital Space, and Faller Status in Older Adults.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Translation, validity and reliability of the fall risk scale for older adults.BMC geriatrics · 2024Article
- Clinical pharmacist-led assessment and management of anticholinergic burden and fall risk in geriatric patients.BMC geriatrics · 2023Article
- Predictive ability of a self-rated fall risk assessment tool in community-dwelling older women.Aging clinical and experimental research · 2023Article
- Fall Risk Assessment Scales: A Systematic Literature Review.Nursing reports (Pavia, Italy) · 2021Review
- [Ankle fractures in older patients : What should we do differently?]Der Unfallchirurg · 2021Review
- Article
- [Geriatric Trauma Center DGU®: Evaluation of clinical and economic parameters : A pilot study in a german university hospital].Der Unfallchirurg · 2019Article
- [Evaluation of a simple screening tool for ambulant fall prevention].Der Unfallchirurg · 2018Article
- Satisfying Product Features of a Fall Prevention Smartphone App and Potential Users' Willingness to Pay: Web-Based Survey Among Older Adults.JMIR mHealth and uHealth · 2018Article
- [Fractures of the ankle joint in elderly patients].Der Unfallchirurg · 2017Article
- [Minimally invasive osteosynthesis after ankle fractures in geriatric patients : Surgical technique with the aid of headless full thread screws].Der Unfallchirurg · 2017Review
- Is independence of older adults safe considering the risk of falls?BMC geriatrics · 2017Article
- The "Aachen fall prevention App" - a Smartphone application app for the self-assessment of elderly patients at risk for ground level falls.Patient safety in surgery · 2017Article
- The Aachen Mobility and Balance Index to measure physiological falls risk: a comparison with the Tinetti POMA Scale.European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society · 2016Article
- [Anesthesiological management of elderly trauma patients].Der Anaesthesist · 2016Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe incidence of falls in the elderly population is difficult to determine and therefore potentially underestimated. Screening algorithms usually have in common that the evaluation is undertaken by trained individuals in a hospital setting. This leads to the inclusion of a high proportion of low-risk people and a waste of resources. It would be advantageous to pretest the individuals at risk in their own environment using a simple self-assessment approach.
methodsThe consensus process of our group of clinicians and physical therapists included: 1. a preparative literature review about risk profiles and assessment tools for ground level falls; 2. a selection of appropriate questions that cover all health aspects involved in an increased risk for falling; and 3. a selection of a simple physical test that can be used at home without the need of a health care professional. We thus searched to develop a scale that can be used by older citizen at higher risk of falling. The current manuscript summarizes the results of this review, consensus and selection process.
resultsThe literature search was undertaken between March and August 1, 2013. The selection process for the questions used (Part I) lasted between March 2013 and January 2014. Among all tests evaluated the 20 second standing test (Part II) was deemed to be safe to be performed even by an individual at risk for a fall, as it closely resembles activities of daily living. The `Aachen Falls Prevention Scale` finally uses a self-assessment tool grading falls risk on a scale of 1 to 10 by the individual itself after completion of Part I and Part II. In summary, we present a scale that might offer a self-assessment option to improve the measures of falls prevention pass for elderly citizens.
conclusionsThe introduction of the `Aachen Falls Prevention Scale` which combines a simple questionnaire with a safe and quick balance tool, meets the criteria to identify whether or not a balance problem exists - the first step in evaluation of falls risk. Further studies will have to assess the ability of an individual to estimate his or her individual falls risk on a longitudinal basis and possibly trigger the necessity for the assessment by a physician.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.