Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25685067›Full record

ArticleCancer cell international2015

Treatment with the PARP inhibitor, niraparib, sensitizes colorectal cancer cell lines to irinotecan regardless of MSI/MSS status.

Sybil M Genther Williams, Apryle M Kuznicki, Paula Andrade, Brian M Dolinski, Cem Elbi, Ronan C O'Hagan, Carlo Toniatti

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer cell international, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 46 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Targeted Treatment against Cancer Stem Cells in Colorectal Cancer.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Review
  8. PARP Inhibitors in Colorectal Malignancies: A 2023 Update.Reviews on recent clinical trials · 2024
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Sybil M Genther WilliamsDepartment of Oncology, Merck Research Laboratories, 33 Avenue Louis Pasteur, Boston, MA 02115 USA.
Apryle M KuznickiDepartment of In Vivo Pharmacology, Merck Research Laboratories, 33 Avenue Louis Pasteur, Boston, MA 02115 USA.
Paula AndradeDepartment of In Vivo Pharmacology, Merck Research Laboratories, 33 Avenue Louis Pasteur, Boston, MA 02115 USA.
Brian M DolinskiDepartment of Oncology, Merck Research Laboratories, 33 Avenue Louis Pasteur, Boston, MA 02115 USA.
Cem ElbiDepartment of Oncology, Merck Research Laboratories, 33 Avenue Louis Pasteur, Boston, MA 02115 USA ; Current address: Bayer HealthCare, 100 Bayer Road, Whippany, NJ 07891 USA.
Ronan C O'HaganDepartment of Oncology, Merck Research Laboratories, 33 Avenue Louis Pasteur, Boston, MA 02115 USA.
Carlo ToniattiDepartment of Oncology, Merck Research Laboratories, 33 Avenue Louis Pasteur, Boston, MA 02115 USA ; Current address: Institute for Applied Cancer Science, 1901 East Road, Unit 1956, Room 4SCR6.1009, Houston, TX 77005 USA.
Merck & Co., Inc., Rahway, NJ, USA (United States) · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCells with homologous recombination (HR) deficiency, most notably caused by mutations in the BRCA1 or BRCA2 genes, are sensitive to PARP inhibition. Microsatellite instability (MSI) accounts for 10-15% of colorectal cancer (CRC) and is hypothesized to lead to HR defects due to altered expression of Mre11, a protein required for double strand break (DSB) repair. Indeed, others have reported that PARP inhibition is efficacious in MSI CRC.

methodsHere we examine the response to niraparib, a potent PARP-1/PARP-2 inhibitor currently under clinical evaluation, in MSI versus microsatellite stable (MSS) CRC cell lines in vitro and in vivo. We compiled a large panel of MSI and MSS CRC cell lines and evaluated the anti-proliferative activity of niraparib. In addition to testing single agent cytotoxic activity of niraparib, we also tested irinotecan (or SN-38, the active metabolite of irinotecan) activity alone and in combination with niraparib in vitro and in vivo.

resultsIn contrast to earlier reports, MSI CRC cell lines were not more sensitive to niraparib than MSS CRC cell lines¸ suggesting that the MSI phenotype does not sensitize CRC cell lines to PARP inhibition. Moreover, even the most sensitive MSI cell lines had niraparib EC50s greater than 10 fold higher than BRCA-deficient cell lines. However, MSI lines were more sensitive to SN-38 than MSS lines, consistent with previous findings. We have also demonstrated that combination of niraparib and irinotecan was more efficacious than either agent alone in both MSI and MSS cell lines both in vitro and in vivo, and that niraparib potentiates the effect of irinotecan regardless of MSI status.

conclusionsOur results support the clinical evaluation of this combination in all CRC patients, regardless of MSI status.

Identifiers

PMID25685067
PMCPMC4326439
OpenAlexW2154285969

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.