Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25684962›Full record

ArticleWorld journal of gastroenterology2015

Incidence and psychological-behavioral characteristics of refractory functional dyspepsia: a large, multi-center, prospective investigation from China.

Shu-Man Jiang, Lin Jia, Xiao-Gai Lei, Ming Xu, Sheng-Bing Wang, Jing Liu, Min Song, Wei-Dong Li

Open access · hybridAbstract readComparative StudyMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in World journal of gastroenterology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 54 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Guideline
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Pharmaceutical biology · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Shu-Man JiangShu-Man Jiang, Lin Jia, Xiao-Gai Lei, Jing Liu, Min Song, Wei-Dong Li, Department of Gastroenterology, Guangzhou First People's Hospital, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou 510180, Guangdong Province, China.
Lin JiaShu-Man Jiang, Lin Jia, Xiao-Gai Lei, Jing Liu, Min Song, Wei-Dong Li, Department of Gastroenterology, Guangzhou First People's Hospital, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou 510180, Guangdong Province, China.
Xiao-Gai LeiShu-Man Jiang, Lin Jia, Xiao-Gai Lei, Jing Liu, Min Song, Wei-Dong Li, Department of Gastroenterology, Guangzhou First People's Hospital, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou 510180, Guangdong Province, China.
Ming XuShu-Man Jiang, Lin Jia, Xiao-Gai Lei, Jing Liu, Min Song, Wei-Dong Li, Department of Gastroenterology, Guangzhou First People's Hospital, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou 510180, Guangdong Province, China.
Sheng-Bing WangShu-Man Jiang, Lin Jia, Xiao-Gai Lei, Jing Liu, Min Song, Wei-Dong Li, Department of Gastroenterology, Guangzhou First People's Hospital, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou 510180, Guangdong Province, China.
Jing LiuShu-Man Jiang, Lin Jia, Xiao-Gai Lei, Jing Liu, Min Song, Wei-Dong Li, Department of Gastroenterology, Guangzhou First People's Hospital, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou 510180, Guangdong Province, China.
Min SongShu-Man Jiang, Lin Jia, Xiao-Gai Lei, Jing Liu, Min Song, Wei-Dong Li, Department of Gastroenterology, Guangzhou First People's Hospital, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou 510180, Guangdong Province, China.
Wei-Dong LiShu-Man Jiang, Lin Jia, Xiao-Gai Lei, Jing Liu, Min Song, Wei-Dong Li, Department of Gastroenterology, Guangzhou First People's Hospital, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou 510180, Guangdong Province, China.
Guangzhou First People's Hospital · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimTo explore the incidence and psychological and behavioral characteristics of refractory functional dyspepsia (RFD) in China.

methodsThe subjects of this study were 1341 new outpatients with functional dyspepsia (FD) who were diagnosed according to the Rome III criteria at four hospitals in Guangdong Province between June and September 2012, and 100 healthy volunteers. All subjects completed questionnaires and scales administered.

resultsThree-hundred and twenty-seven of the 1341 patients with FD had RFD (24.4%). Patients with RFD had a longer disease duration and a more severe form of the disease than patients with non-refractory FD (NRFD). The prevalence of depression and anxiety symptoms was higher in patients with RFD than in patients with NRFD. The prevalence of unhealthy eating behaviors, lack of physical activity, and sleeping disorders was higher in patients with RFD than in patients with NRFD. Patients with RFD sought medical advice on more occasions and spent more money on treatment than patients with NRFD. Finally, patients with RFD had poorer quality of life than patients with NRFD.

conclusionRFD is not rare in clinical practice and should get attention by patients and doctors because of its long duration, severe symptoms, and associations with abnormal psychology and poor quality of life.

Indexed as

Health BehaviorAdolescentAdultAgedAnxietyCase-Control StudiesChinaDepressionDyspepsiaFeeding BehaviorFemaleHealth Care CostsHealth ExpendituresHumansIncidenceMaleAnxietyBehaviorDepressionPsychological-behavioral characteristicsQuality of lifeRefractory functional dyspepsia

Identifiers

PMID25684962
PMCPMC4323473
OpenAlexW2036074799

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.