Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25684281›Full record

ArticleJournal of biomedical materials research. Part A2015

Extended culture of macrophages from different sources and maturation results in a common M2 phenotype.

Lisa M Chamberlain, Dolly Holt-Casper, Mercedes Gonzalez-Juarrero, David W Grainger

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of biomedical materials research. Part A, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 50 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Macrophage variants in laboratory research: most are well done, but some are RAW.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2024
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2024
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Drug discovery today. Disease models · 2017
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Lisa M ChamberlainCell and Molecular Biology Program, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado, 80523.
Dolly Holt-CasperDepartment of Bioengineering, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, 84112-5820.
Mercedes Gonzalez-JuarreroCell and Molecular Biology Program, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado, 80523.
David W GraingerDepartment of Pharmaceutics and Pharmaceutical Chemistry, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, 84112-5820.
University of Utah · USColorado State University · US

Funding

Molecular Comparison of Macrophage Foreign Body ResponseR01EB000894 · NIBIB · UNIVERSITY OF UTAH · PI GRAINGER, DAVID W · 2004 to 2007
$1.1M
NIBIB NIH HHS EB000894NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB000894
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Inflammatory responses to biomaterials heavily influence the environment surrounding implanted devices, often producing foreign-body reactions. The macrophage is a key immunomodulatory cell type consistently associated with implanted biomaterials and routinely used in short-term in vitro cell studies of biomaterials aiming to reproduce host responses. Inconsistencies within these studies, including differently sourced cells, different durations of culture, and assessment of different activation markers, lead to many conflicting results in vitro that confound consistency and conclusions. We hypothesize that different experimentally popular monocyte-macrophage cell types have intrinsic in vitro culture-specific differences that yield conflicting results. Recent studies demonstrate changes in cultured macrophage cytokine expression over time, leading to the hypothesis that changes in macrophage phenotype also occur in response to extended culture. Here, macrophage cells of different transformed and primary-derived origins were cultured for 21 days on model polymer biomaterials. Cell type-based differences in morphology and cytokine/chemokine expression as well as changes in cell surface biomarkers associated with differentiation stage, activation state, and adhesion were compared. Results reflect consistent macrophage development toward an M2 phenotype via up-regulation of the macrophage mannose receptor for all cell types following 21-day extended culture. Significantly, implanted biomaterials experiencing the foreign-body response and encapsulation in vivo often elicit a shift toward an analogous M2 macrophage phenotype. In vitro "default" of macrophage cultures, regardless of lineage, to this M2 state in the presence of biomaterials at long culture periods is not recognized, but has important implications to in vitro modeling of in vivo host response.

Indexed as

AnimalsBiocompatible MaterialsCell CountCell Culture TechniquesCell DifferentiationCell LineCell ShapeCytokinesForeign-Body ReactionMacrophage ActivationMacrophagesMaterials TestingMiceMice, Inbred C57BLPhenotypeSurface PropertiesBiocompatible MaterialsCytokinesbiocompatibilitycell activationcell culturecytokineforeign-body responseinflammatory phenotypein vitro

Identifiers

PMID25684281
PMCPMC4520783
OpenAlexW1791734915

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.