ReviewWiley interdisciplinary reviews. Nanomedicine and nanobiotechnology
Virus-based nanomaterials as positron emission tomography and magnetic resonance contrast agents: from technology development to translational medicine.
Review in Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. Nanomedicine and nanobiotechnology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
19 citing papers in PubMed, 48 citations in OpenAlex.
- Design andMaterials today. Bio · 2026Article
- iRGD-targeted Physalis Mottle Virus-like Nanoparticles for Targeted Cancer Delivery.Small science · 2023Article
- Nanostructures for prevention, diagnosis, and treatment of viral respiratory infections: from influenza virus to SARS-CoV-2 variants.Journal of nanobiotechnology · 2023Review
- Exploring the translational challenge for medical applications of ionising radiation and corresponding radiation protection research.Journal of translational medicine · 2022Article
- Virus-like nanoparticles as a theranostic platform for cancer.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2022Review
- Affinity Sedimentation and Magnetic Separation With Plant-Made Immunosorbent Nanoparticles for Therapeutic Protein Purification.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2022Article
- Optimizing use of theranostic nanoparticles as a life-saving strategy for treating COVID-19 patients.Theranostics · 2020Review
- Radiolabeled PET/MRI Nanoparticles for Tumor Imaging.Journal of clinical medicine · 2019Review
- Developing Protein-Based Nanoparticles as Versatile Delivery Systems for Cancer Therapy and Imaging.Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2019Review
- Recent Trends of the Bio-Inspired Nanoparticles in Cancer Theranostics.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2019Review
- Micelles with ultralow critical micelle concentration as carriers for drug delivery.Nature biomedical engineering · 2018Article
- Review
- Physalis Mottle Virus-Like Particles as Nanocarriers for Imaging Reagents and Drugs.Biomacromolecules · 2017Article
- Viral nanoparticles decorated with novel EGFL7 ligands enable intravital imaging of tumor neovasculature.Nanoscale · 2017Article
- Optical and Magnetic Resonance Imaging Using Fluorous Colloidal Nanoparticles.Biomacromolecules · 2017Article
- Encapsulation of Inorganic Nanomaterials inside Virus-Based Nanoparticles for Bioimaging.Nanotheranostics · 2017Review
- Serum albumin 'camouflage' of plant virus based nanoparticles prevents their antibody recognition and enhances pharmacokinetics.Biomaterials · 2016Article
- Targeted Nanotheranostics for Future Personalized Medicine: Recent Progress in Cancer Therapy.Theranostics · 2016Review
- Silica-coated Gd(DOTA)-loaded protein nanoparticles enable magnetic resonance imaging of macrophages.Journal of materials chemistry. B · 2015Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Viruses have recently emerged as ideal protein scaffolds for a new class of contrast agents that can be used in medical imaging procedures such as positron emission tomography (PET) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Whereas synthetic nanoparticles are difficult to produce as homogeneous formulations due to the inherently stochastic nature of the synthesis process, virus-based nanoparticles are genetically encoded and are therefore produced as homogeneous and monodisperse preparations with a high degree of quality control. Because the virus capsids have a defined chemical structure that has evolved to carry cargoes of nucleic acids, they can be modified to carry precisely defined cargoes of contrast agents and can be decorated with spatially defined contrast reagents on the internal or external surfaces. Viral nanoparticles can also be genetically programed or conjugated with targeting ligands to deliver contrast agents to specific cells, and the natural biocompatibility of viruses means that they are cleared rapidly from the body. Nanoparticles based on bacteriophages and plant viruses are safe for use in humans and can be produced inexpensively in large quantities as self-assembling recombinant proteins. Based on these considerations, a new generation of contrast agents has been developed using bacteriophages and plant viruses as scaffolds to carry positron-emitting radioisotopes such as [(18) F] fluorodeoxyglucose for PET imaging and iron oxide or Gd(3+) for MRI. Although challenges such as immunogenicity, loading efficiency, and regulatory compliance remain to be address, virus-based nanoparticles represent a promising new enabling technology for a new generation of highly biocompatible and biodegradable targeted imaging reagents.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.