Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25683726›Full record

ArticleMolecular medicine reports2015

Impact of tissue type and content of neoplastic cells of samples on the quality of epidermal growth factor receptor mutation analysis among patients with lung adenocarcinoma.

Panagiotis Paliogiannis, Federico Attene, Antonio Cossu, Efisio Defraia, Giuseppe Porcu, Annamaria Carta, Maria Ignazia Sotgiu, Antonio Pazzola, Lorenzo Cordero, Francesca Capelli and 7 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular medicine reports, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 30% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Bronchial mucoepidermoid carcinoma: A case report.International journal of surgery case reports · 2017
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Panagiotis PaliogiannisDepartment of Surgical, Microsurgical and Medical Sciences, University of Sassari, Sassari 07100, Italy.
Federico AtteneDepartment of Surgical, Microsurgical and Medical Sciences, University of Sassari, Sassari 07100, Italy.
Antonio CossuDepartment of Surgical, Microsurgical and Medical Sciences, University of Sassari, Sassari 07100, Italy.
Efisio DefraiaPathology and Oncology Unit, Businco Oncological Hospital, Cagliari 09121, Italy.
Giuseppe PorcuPathology and Oncology Unit, Businco Oncological Hospital, Cagliari 09121, Italy.
Annamaria CartaPathology and Oncology Unit, Businco Oncological Hospital, Cagliari 09121, Italy.
Maria Ignazia SotgiuPathology and Oncology Unit, Businco Oncological Hospital, Cagliari 09121, Italy.
Antonio PazzolaMedical Oncology Unit, Local Health Unit (Azienda Sanitaria Locale), Sassari 07100, Italy.
Lorenzo CorderoClinical Pulmonology and Tisiology Unit, Hospital‑University (Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria), Sassari 07100, Italy.
Francesca CapelliMedical Oncology Unit, 'Zonchello' Hospital, Nuoro 08100, Italy.
Giovanni Maria FaddaMedical Oncology Unit, 'Zonchello' Hospital, Nuoro 08100, Italy.
Salvatore OrtuMedical Oncology Unit, 'San Giovanni di Dio' Hospital, Olbia 07026, Italy.
Giovanni SotgiuEpidemiology and Medical Statistics Unit, Department of Biomedical Sciences, University of Sassari, Sassari 07100, Italy.
Grazia PalombaUnit of Cancer Genetics, Institute of Biomolecular Chemistry, National Research Council (Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche), Sassari 07100, Italy.
Maria Cristina SiniUnit of Cancer Genetics, Institute of Biomolecular Chemistry, National Research Council (Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche), Sassari 07100, Italy.
Giuseppe PalmieriUnit of Cancer Genetics, Institute of Biomolecular Chemistry, National Research Council (Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche), Sassari 07100, Italy.
Maria ColombinoUnit of Cancer Genetics, Institute of Biomolecular Chemistry, National Research Council (Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche), Sassari 07100, Italy.
National Research Council · ITUniversity of Sassari · ITAzienda Ospedaliero Universitaria di Sassari · ITAzienda Sanitaria Locale Roma 3 · ITNuovo Ospedale San Giovanni di Dio · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Assessment of the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutational status has become crucial in recent years in the molecular classification of patients with lung cancer. The impact of the type and quantity of malignant cells of the neoplastic specimen on the quality of mutation analysis remains to be elucidated, and only empirical and sporadic data are available. The aim of the present study was to investigate the impact of tissue type and content of neoplastic cells in the specimen on the quality of EGFR mutation analysis among patients with lung adenocarcinoma. A total of 515 patients with histologically-confirmed disease were included in the present study. Formalin-fixed paraffin embedded tissue samples were used for the mutation analysis and the content of the neoplastic cells was evaluated using light microscopy. Genomic DNA was isolated using a standard protocol. The coding sequences and splice junctions of exons 18, 19 and 21 in the EGFR gene were then screened for mutations by direct automated sequencing. The mean age of the patients examined was 64.9 years and 357 (69.3%) were male. A total of 429 tissue samples (83.3%) were obtained by biopsy and the remaining samples were obtained by surgery. A total of 456 samples (88.5%) were observed from primary lung adenocarcinomas, while 59 (11.5%) were from metastatic lesions. EGFR mutations occurred in 59 cases (11.5%); exon 18 mutations were detected in one case (1.7%), whereas exon 19 and 21 mutations were detected in 30 (51%) and 28 (47.3%) cases, respectively. EGFR mutations were more frequent in females and patients that had never smoked. The distribution of the mutations among primary and metastatic tissues exhibited no significant differences in the proportions of EGFR mutations detected. However, a statistically significant difference in the number of mutations detected was found between samples with at least 50% of neoplastic cells (450 cases-57 mutations; 12.7%) and those with <50% of neoplastic cells (65 cases-2 mutations; 3.1%).

Indexed as

MutationAdenocarcinomaAdenocarcinoma of LungAdultAgedDNA Mutational AnalysisErbB ReceptorsExonsFemaleGene ExpressionHumansLung NeoplasmsLymphatic MetastasisMaleMiddle AgedObserver VariationEGFR protein, humanErbB Receptors

Identifiers

PMID25683726
PMCPMC4438954
OpenAlexW2035381470

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.