Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25683601›Full record

ArticleThe journal of physical chemistry. B2015

Revised Parameters for the AMOEBA Polarizable Atomic Multipole Water Model.

Marie L Laury, Lee-Ping Wang, Vijay S Pande, Teresa Head-Gordon, Jay W Ponder

Abstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in The journal of physical chemistry. B, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 80 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
80citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

80 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Pair Dynamics of Aqueous MgClChemphyschem : a European journal of chemical physics and physical chemistry · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Nutmeg and SPICE: Models and Data for Biomolecular Machine Learning.Journal of chemical theory and computation · 2024
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Evaluating Polarizable Biomembrane Simulations against Experiments.Journal of chemical theory and computation · 2024
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

20 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Marie L Laury *Department of Chemistry, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO 63105.
Lee-Ping Wang *Department of Chemistry, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305.
Vijay S PandeDepartment of Chemistry, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305.
Teresa Head-GordonDepartment of Chemistry, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720.
Jay W PonderDepartment of Chemistry, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO 63105.

Funding

Physics-based Simulation of Biological Structures(RMI)U54GM072970 · NIGMS · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI ALTMAN, RUSS BIAGIO · 2004 to 2013
$33.5M
DEVELOPMENT OF A NEXT-GENERATION NUCLEIC ACID FORCE FIELDR01GM106137 · NIGMS · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI JAY PONDER, Pengyu Ren · 2013 to 2026
$3.5M
DISCOVERY OF NEW THERAPEUTICS FOR DRUG-FREE REMISSION OF HIVR01GM106974 · NIGMS · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI MARSHALL, GARLAND ROSS · 2013 to 2016
$1.5M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM106137NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM106974NIGMS NIH HHS U54 GM072970
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A set of improved parameters for the AMOEBA polarizable atomic multipole water model is developed. An automated procedure, ForceBalance, is used to adjust model parameters to enforce agreement with ab initio-derived results for water clusters and experimental data for a variety of liquid phase properties across a broad temperature range. The values reported here for the new AMOEBA14 water model represent a substantial improvement over the previous AMOEBA03 model. The AMOEBA14 model accurately predicts the temperature of maximum density and qualitatively matches the experimental density curve across temperatures from 249 to 373 K. Excellent agreement is observed for the AMOEBA14 model in comparison to experimental properties as a function of temperature, including the second virial coefficient, enthalpy of vaporization, isothermal compressibility, thermal expansion coefficient, and dielectric constant. The viscosity, self-diffusion constant, and surface tension are also well reproduced. In comparison to high-level ab initio results for clusters of 2-20 water molecules, the AMOEBA14 model yields results similar to AMOEBA03 and the direct polarization iAMOEBA models. With advances in computing power, calibration data, and optimization techniques, we recommend the use of the AMOEBA14 water model for future studies employing a polarizable water model.

Indexed as

Models, ChemicalDiffusionIonsPattern Recognition, AutomatedPhase TransitionStatic ElectricitySurface PropertiesTemperatureViscosityWaterX-Ray DiffractionIonsWater

Identifiers

PMID25683601
PMCPMC4772747

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.