Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25683334›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of molecular medicine2015

Characterization of three alternative transcripts of the BRCA1 gene in patients with breast cancer and a family history of breast and/or ovarian cancer who tested negative for pathogenic mutations.

Gaetana Gambino, Mariella Tancredi, Elisabetta Falaschi, Paolo Aretini, Maria Adelaide Caligo

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of molecular medicine, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. From bulk, single-cell to spatial RNA sequencing.International journal of oral science · 2021
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Investigating of variations in BRCA1 gene in Iranian families with breast cancer.Medical journal of the Islamic Republic of Iran · 2018
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Emerging technologies for salivaomics in cancer detection.Journal of cellular and molecular medicine · 2017
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Gaetana GambinoDepartment of Translational Research and New Technologies in Medicine, University of Pisa, Pisa 56126, Italy.
Mariella TancrediDepartment of Translational Research and New Technologies in Medicine, University of Pisa, Pisa 56126, Italy.
Elisabetta FalaschiSection of Genetic Oncology, Santa Chiara University Hospital, Pisa 56126, Italy.
Paolo AretiniFondazione Pisana per la Scienza - ONLUS, Pisa 56126, Italy.
Maria Adelaide CaligoDepartment of Translational Research and New Technologies in Medicine, University of Pisa, Pisa 56126, Italy.
University of Pisa · ITInternational Flame Research Foundation · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The study of BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes and their alterations has been essential to the understanding of the development of familial breast and ovarian cancers. Many of the variants identified have an unknown pathogenic significance. These include variants which determine alternative mRNA splicing, identified in the intronic regions and those are capable of destroying the splicing ability. The aim of this study was to detect BRCA1/BRCA2 aberrant transcripts resulting from alternative splicing, in women with a known family history and/or early onset of breast and/or ovarian cancer, tested wild-type for BRCA1 and BRCA2. The identification and characterization of aberrant transcripts through the analysis of mRNA levels in blood lymphocytes may help us to recognize families otherwise misclassified as wild-type BRCA1 and BRCA2. Blood samples were collected from 13 women that had a family history of breast and/or ovarian cancer and tested negative for pathogenic mutations in the BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes. Total RNA was analyzed for the presence of BRCA1 and BRCA2 naturally occurring and pathological transcripts using RT-PCR. In 2 out of the 13 samples, 2 alternative transcripts of the BRCA1 gene were identified. These were probably pathogenic as they lacked exon 17 and exon 15, respectively, giving rise to a truncated protein. In addition to these, we identified the Δ17-19 transcript in 1 patient, which gives rise to a protein with an in-frame deletion of 69 amino acids. In conclusion, this study on alternative transcripts of the BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes revealed the presence of isoforms (prevalence of 15%) in blood samples from women with breast and ovarian cancer that were probably pathogenic, that were not detected by conventional methods of mutation screening based on direct sequencing of all coding regions, intron-exons junctions and MLPA analysis.

Indexed as

Alternative SplicingGenes, BRCA1AdultBreast NeoplasmsExonsFemaleGenes, BRCA2Genetic Association StudiesHereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer SyndromeHumansMiddle AgedMutationRNA IsoformsRNA, MessengerSequence Analysis, DNATranscription, GeneticRNA IsoformsRNA, Messenger

Identifiers

PMID25683334
PMCPMC4356434
OpenAlexW2089759450

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.